Proposal: Anaheim- Edmonton

DingDongCharlie

Registered User
Sep 12, 2010
11,370
9,338
I posted this in another thread and I’m curious on if it’s fair value or doable for both teams involved.

Anaheim:
Draisaitl + Nurse

Edmonton:
Lindholm + Rakell

Edmonton runs McD and Nuge as 1-2 down the middle with Rakell replacing Draisaitl on McD wing. Finally gets a #1 defenceman. Lindholm-Klefbom-Larsson-Jones-Russell-Bouchard looks like an excellent d core. Doesn’t solve all the teams issues yet builds the team solid from the net out.

If any team could move a #1 defenceman a club with Fowler-Montdor-Manson-Nurse top 4 could feasibly anyways. A Getzlaf-Draisaitl 1-2 punch down the middle would be dangerous.

I’m not sure Anaheim moves a #1 defenceman as they generally are never available. There’s also the knock for Edmonton already needing scoring help that’s hard to over look. As an Edmonton I go with fixing the D and addressing winger depth after.
 

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
20,457
13,546
Pickering, Ontario
But

Drai >= Lindholm
Nurse >= Rakell

Even if Anaheim says yes, this is one Edmonton says no to.
How is Nurse better than Rakell. Rakell has a better deal, is a proven elite goal scorer and has a history of seeing growth in his game on a yearly basis. This year is a down year for the ducks as their team is a mess. But Rakell has been about a 65 pt player the past two years. Agree with Draisaitl one just not nurse being better than rakell.
 

DingDongCharlie

Registered User
Sep 12, 2010
11,370
9,338
But

Drai >= Lindholm
Nurse >= Rakell

Even if Anaheim says yes, this is one Edmonton says no to.

Maybe 3 years of Chiarelli tainted me on what we could expect back for our assets?!?!

Would swapping Jones+ for Nurse make it closer is is the base around Draisaitl for Lindholm not workable?
 

HockeyDBspecialist

Habs 2019 cup champ
Jan 30, 2018
6,000
3,386
Montreal
Awful for edm
Awful is a big word,
Lindholm was one of the best in the league (top 8 I think) in advanced stats. And Rackell has the ceilling of a 70p+ LW/C/RW

Honnestly, Value wise it's legit.

IMO:
Lindholm is 2 tier above Nurse
Draisaitl is 1 tier and a half above Rackell
Center > D


Deal is pretty fair in my book
 
  • Like
Reactions: DingDongCharlie

780il

edm
May 29, 2018
12,622
14,463
Edmonton AB
How is Nurse better than Rakell. Rakell has a better deal, is a proven elite goal scorer and has a history of seeing growth in his game on a yearly basis. This year is a down year for the ducks as their team is a mess. But Rakell has been about a 65 pt player the past two years. Agree with Draisaitl one just not nurse being better than rakell.
Nurse isn't chopped liver either. A 23 year old dman, who skates like him, plays a hard nosed style like him, and is on pace for 40 points are worth a lot
 

780il

edm
May 29, 2018
12,622
14,463
Edmonton AB
Maybe 3 years of Chiarelli tainted me on what we could expect back for our assets?!?!

Would swapping Jones+ for Nurse make it closer is is the base around Draisaitl for Lindholm not workable?
If it was Draisaitl + Jones + Puljujarvi for Lindholm and Rakell then I'd do it.

In that case, move Nurse right after for another forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DingDongCharlie

CapnZin

Registered User
Jul 20, 2017
4,665
6,204
Sweden
But

Drai >= Lindholm
Nurse = Rakell

Even if Anaheim says yes, this is one Edmonton says no to.
I would do this with D-D and F-F rather than D-F.

Drai > Rakell
Lindholm >> Nurse


Just depends what everyone thinks about Drai and Rakell. Personally, I know more about Rakell so my margin may be biased. P
 

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
20,457
13,546
Pickering, Ontario
Nurse isn't chopped liver either. A 23 year old dman, who skates like him, plays a hard nosed style like him, and is on pace for 40 points are worth a lot

Hasn't he been poor defensively? Have heard he has been playing too aggressive and been out of position on the ice leading to him being on the ice for high scoring chances and goals. Obviously since the season must be pretty frustrating for Oiler fans so they will probably over exaggerate instances where he makes these bad reads, but there must be some truth to them. Last season if I ever read a GDT/PGT for the Oilers games, I saw that he was being praised for his growth as a defensive player while showing some offensive poise. This year his stats have improved in terms of offense, but Oiler fans opinion on his defensive game has dipped a bit. Overall he is still really valuable and a great player to have, but rakell is a signed for 3 more years at 3.8 and should be a 65-70 point player. He carries more value than nurse and I see him as a more impactful player right now.
 

thadd

Oil4Life
Jun 9, 2007
26,726
2,731
Canada
I don't see Edmonton trading Klefbom or Nurse. Out of our core d-men they look to be untouchable.
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
27,430
7,532
British Columbia
I just don’t see the logic in the Oilers downgrading at the position we’re weakest at. Especially when, as good as Lindholm is, it doesn’t even address the issue on our blue line (we could use a right shot PP QB). Easy pass in my books

Hasn't he been poor defensively?

No. He’s just a 2nd pairing dman being asked to carry the team while Klefbom is out. His defense is fine.
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
16,966
6,603
Halifax
Not a chance.... Drai is way to good for that crap
Which piece is crap ? While I have always defended Nurse he is the least valuable piece in the deal while Draisaitl is the most valuable piece . A trade like this would start a proper retooling by building for the net out . D core would be complete . It also sets the Ducks up nicely with a number 1 C for the future . OP is very fair value wise
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad