LadyStanley
Registered User
http://spectorshockey.net/blog/nhl-cba-crack-hunters/
Richardson: If you're looking for cracks in current negotiations, hard to find.
Richardson: If you're looking for cracks in current negotiations, hard to find.
What entitles the players to the extra 14% they are getting over the owners?
If one cannot exist without the other, why is it not 50/50?
There are two thoughts that linger in the deepest, most cynical and fatalistic portion of our hockey brains.
The first is that a players' union doesn't hire Donald Fehr to strike a deal in October or November. The second is that the NHLPA, with Fehr carrying its flag, so despises Gary Bettman and so desires a victory against the owners that something as self-defeating as an attack on the salary cap might actually happen.
What entitled them to the "Extra 14%" over the last 7 years was a collectively bargained agreement between the NHL and the NHLPA.
Going forward, the players will be entitled to whatever percentage the NHL and NHLPA agree upon in a new CBA.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/donald-fehr-nuclear-option-vs-nhl-140036957--nhl.html
Puck Daddy: Fehr's nuclear option vs NHL
What a moronic stance for them to take. The NHLPA is acting like they WANT to miss 2 seasons. The Crosby's and Ovechkins will be fine but your average 4th liners are going to have to start pumping gas soon.
Has anyone checked on Krys Barch lately? Is he ok? I hope that ****er goes broke.
I get that they were entitled to it in the previous CBA but what leg do they have to stand on other than "we deserve more because you shut up"
What a moronic stance for them to take. The NHLPA is acting like they WANT to miss 2 seasons. The Crosby's and Ovechkins will be fine but your average 4th liners are going to have to start pumping gas soon.
Has anyone checked on Krys Barch lately? Is he ok? I hope that ****er goes broke.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/donald-fehr-nuclear-option-vs-nhl-140036957--nhl.html
Puck Daddy: Fehr's nuclear option vs NHL
This post mirrors my thoughts.You certainly are missing something here. Owners are spending to the cap, when the team doesn't have the money. They want their team competitive at any cost. In their minds, if they become a solid playoff team, maybe even win the cup, they'll start becoming profitable! If they don't make the playoffs, or the fans still don't come to games, then it's, "oh well, let's cry how poor we are and hammer the players in the next CBA negotiations".
In my mind, you can't just mismanage a team and then blame it on the player's salaries. I think the player's do need to give back a little, but the revenue sharing model makes sense. How is it fair that if the player's gave in, that the remaining 20 teams become profitable (despite poor management/location/performance), and the 10 already immensely profitable teams start raking in even more profit. There needs to be compromise.
What a moronic stance for them to take. The NHLPA is acting like they WANT to miss 2 seasons. The Crosby's and Ovechkins will be fine but your average 4th liners are going to have to start pumping gas soon.
Has anyone checked on Krys Barch lately? Is he ok? I hope that ****er goes broke.
Moronic yes-but who are we talking about?
The Goodenow guys, Ference and the others that pitched Kelly over the side, Richard Rodier, agents such as Alan Walsh and Ian Pulvar, Eric Lindros- all these people want revenge on Bettman and seemingly dont seem to care about the players whose careers may be shortened or finished if this goes for a year.
All the gag inducing hypocrisy about this being for the future-baloney. This is about revenge and ego gratification of a certain group of people in the PA who have manipulated the players into being their dupes.
It's not even that that players don't accept that they percentage has to drop.
From everything I've read, the owners want the cut in percentage to happen all in year one and players want to freeze salaries and have the percentage fall as revenues rise and salaries stay the same.I think the only way a deal gets done any time soon is if the PA propose a deal that lowers the amount of actual dollars they get in year 1 by a tangible amount.
Something like 53-54% for year one and freeze it there as long as that amount is higher than 50% and then link it at 50% going forward.
The Goodenow guys, Ference and the others that pitched Kelly over the side, Richard Rodier, agents such as Alan Walsh and Ian Pulvar, Eric Lindros- all these people want revenge on Bettman and seemingly dont seem to care about the players whose careers may be shortened or finished if this goes for a year.
All the gag inducing hypocrisy about this being for the future-baloney. This is about revenge and ego gratification of a certain group of people in the PA who have manipulated the players into being their dupes.
Well put. I'm sure if the NHL had axed Bettman and hired somebody else as the commissioner, the negotiations would be going in a completely different direction.
You certainly are missing something here. Owners are spending to the cap, when the team doesn't have the money. They want their team competitive at any cost. In their minds, if they become a solid playoff team, maybe even win the cup, they'll start becoming profitable! If they don't make the playoffs, or the fans still don't come to games, then it's, "oh well, let's cry how poor we are and hammer the players in the next CBA negotiations".
In my mind, you can't just mismanage a team and then blame it on the player's salaries. I think the player's do need to give back a little, but the revenue sharing model makes sense. How is it fair that if the player's gave in, that the remaining 20 teams become profitable (despite poor management/location/performance), and the 10 already immensely profitable teams start raking in even more profit. There needs to be compromise.
Someday - it maybe be today, a week or a month from now, or even 6 months from now: many NHL players will realize: "ya know, we were averaging $2.5m last year, now we're getting nothing.
Even if the 2.5 drops to 2.1 or even 2.0, that's pretty good money I must say. And it's a whole lot more than zero. hmm...."
Moronic yes-but who are we talking about?
The Goodenow guys, Ference and the others that pitched Kelly over the side, Richard Rodier, agents such as Alan Walsh and Ian Pulvar, Eric Lindros- all these people want revenge on Bettman and seemingly dont seem to care about the players whose careers may be shortened or finished if this goes for a year.
All the gag inducing hypocrisy about this being for the future-baloney. This is about revenge and ego gratification of a certain group of people in the PA who have manipulated the players into being their dupes.