Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 53,928
- 31,140
You aren't applying rules of logic because there never was a rule that he can't play here, you've created a false premise and extended from there, it's more of a fallicy then the application of logic.No, that is not what I am saying. When I say logically, I am saying that if we applied rules of logic then if he can't play hockey in one location he can't play hockey in a different location. Location is not part of a logic equation. However it is part of the social equation.
Sure, some people. When a threshold number of those people is met, the business decides it's no longer in their best interest to sell that product.As you note "He is a product that people aren't interested in seeing anymore". To which I agree. This is the social side of the equation. However, the more accurate description would be"
"He is a product that some people aren't interested in seeing at this time"
There's no rule that he can't play, just enough people are interested in seeing him play that it no longer is beneficial to offer him to the leagues fans. Overseas, another business selling to different clients can make their own decisions on whether or not to employ him, and unless I happen to watch games in that league, I don't really have to care what they decide to do.
The people who aren't interested in watching him don't make the decision on whether to employ him or not. Just because you like the McRib, doesn't mean McDonald's has to sell it to you, they need enough market force to make it worth their while.