Those amateur logos are the worst. A shield with a star, an anchor, a helm, a tiger and a year of foundation? It is so overloaded it's ridiculous. You couldn't have possibly thought that someone would actually choose it as a logo.
Official voting - http://miklushevskiy.ru/hockey-logo/
There are not many teams in KHL with colors like in the second submission. Neftekhimik colors are somewhat close, if you mix 'em with Slovan's dark blue. Still, it's pretty logical choice. Black/white one resembles Admiral's uniform, sea color is pretty obvious. They shouldn't chase uniqueness if it doesn't fit them.
As for orange, well, if/when Sibir changes their colors to orange, some people will start to complain that there are too many teams with orange already. And if any team should wear orange, it should be Sibir.
I can't really think of anything about Siberia that screams orange to me. Those MHL guys resemble Irn Bru bottles if anything. That would be a terrible idea to go with.
Navy colors are black/gold, not black/white btw.
You haven't seen many naval officers then.Ehm, if I were to name two colors to describe the navy uniforms, it would be black and white.
What are you arguing with? Gold is not a primary color for naval uniforms. White and black are. I know that insignia are of gold color. What are you suggesting? To add gold insignia, ribbons and badges to Admiral's jerseys? I'm afraid it will look a little bit tacky.
Tbh, white is the second primary logo is for every hockey team. Except for Atlant and Kuznya who have colored away jerseys. You see, they don't sport black/white, it's black/gold or white/gold. The elements designed after the (gold) navy insignia are already on the jerseys and they're white. That's my point.
I can't really think of anything about Siberia that screams orange to me.
ummm