Achievements never seen in MLB (theoretical possible)

jcs0218

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
7,968
9,868
Complete game shutout with only 27 pitches thrown...
That is probably the most unlikely yet theoretically possible feat imaginable.

Every pitch would need to be swung at and made contact with. Then a defensive out.
 

jcs0218

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
7,968
9,868
5 hits in a inning without scoring a run
Good idea.

3 hits (all singles). 4th batter gets a single, with a force-out at home. 5th batter gets a single, with a force-out at home.

Then the 6th batter gets out in any fashion.

Very unlikely, but theoretically possible.
 

jcs0218

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
7,968
9,868
A team could win a game without anyone swinging the bat...
Yes.

Especially if they were to play against Rick "Wild Thing" Vaughan from Major League.

He walked the bases on 12 straight pitches and then gave up a homerun to the next batter.

But you could win a game 1-0 if an opposing pitcher even threw 4 pitches and hit your batter 4 straight times.

You could even win a game after 1 pitch. A hit-by-pitch followed by a pickoff move that goes past the 1st baseman and the guy from 1st scores.
 

Unholy Diver

Registered User
Oct 13, 2002
19,240
3,150
in the midnight sea
That is probably the most unlikely yet theoretically possible feat imaginable.

Every pitch would need to be swung at and made contact with. Then a defensive out.


In theory you could do it in zero pitches, the manager could do the pointing intentional walk to each batter and then the pitcher could pick them off
 

Know Your Enemy

Registered
Jul 18, 2004
6,817
391
North Vancouver
Good idea.

3 hits (all singles). 4th batter gets a single, with a force-out at home. 5th batter gets a single, with a force-out at home.

Then the 6th batter gets out in any fashion.

Very unlikely, but theoretically possible.
Would the force out at home be considered a fielder's choice for the batter? Unless maybe the ball was hit to left field.?
 
Last edited:

tank44

Registered User
Feb 1, 2012
646
168
Seattle, WA
I know it's happened once before, but throwing a no hitter and losing the game is a WTF one for sure
No hitter losses have happened but check this out - with the new extra innings rules with a runner on 2nd, you can throw a perfect game and lose it!! Perfect game through 9 innings but your team is say the Mariners and didnt score a run. In extra innings, runner starts on 2nd; and 2 sac-flys later you have 29 straight outs, no hits against, no batter getting on base and 1 run against.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NHL WAR and Lunatik

Lunatik

Registered User
Oct 12, 2012
56,247
8,384
No hitter losses have happened but check this out - with the new extra innings rules with a runner on 2nd, you can throw a perfect game and lose it!! Perfect game through 9 innings but your team is say the Mariners and didnt score a run. In extra innings, runner starts on 2nd; and 2 sac-flys later you have 29 straight outs, no hits against, no batter getting on base and 1 run against.
In a double header you could do this in 9 innings even.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,391
31,691
I’m not sure a team has either been no hit or thrown a no hitter in back to back games.

It’s remarkable to me one pitcher managed to do it in back to back starts.
 

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,371
7,578
90 minute 9 inning game

While never common, this was not uncommon back when batters stayed in the box and pitchers threw the ball promptly. The shortest 9-inning game on record was apparently 51 minutes long (28 September 1919, Giants versus Phillies, first game of a double-header).
 
  • Like
Reactions: NHL WAR

KevFu

Registered User
May 22, 2009
9,181
3,411
Phoenix from Rochester via New Orleans
What about a 110 mph fastball?

Hunter Greene hit 105 in a B game in ST this year, 11o will probably be hit within a decade

Someone throwing a 110 mile an hour fastball has probably already happened: Nolan Ryan.

There's a great documentary (was on Netflix, probably on Prime now) about Fastballs. They talked about the methods attempted to measure pitchers.

Nolan Ryan got clocked at 100.8 mph in the ninth inning of a start for the Angels in the late 70s. But they measured the speed AT HOME PLATE, which is not how they do it now. (and the tech was terrible). They measure the speed of MLB pitchers now using StatCast measurements 10 feet from the pitching rubber, not the plate.

When you account for the 50 feet of drag, Ryan's 100.8 mph pitch would clock in at like 108 today. And that was his like 150th pitch of the night.

Pitching Ninja lined up some of the famous Nolan Ryan clips from the 70s, versus Chapman and Jordan Hicks 105 mph pitches and did the side-by-side, and they look pretty much the same. But again, those two modern guys were closers, and Ryan was a starter. And all the famous Ryan clips are from late in games.

Ryan was a superhuman beast. His last MLB pitch ever, at age 46 was using more modern measuring tech... it clocked in at 96 mph, and on which his frayed UCL finally snapped.

Everyone trying to "mythbust" Ryan hitting 108 has failed to do so. And pretty much every clip they use is when he was in his 30s. When he was in his 20s, he probably hit 110.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad