Except he only has 2 points.Kane looking to catch Ovi in one night.
Jokiharju is on the AHL for seasoning and because we acquired Koekkoek in a trade. His is good offensively, top 20 in points this season for a defenseman, but is an adventure in his own zone. Murphy is good defensively, but he and Keith can't do it alone. Forsling and Dahstrom are young and have a chance of being NHLers in the future, but both have issues at this point.It’s amazing, I’ve said the hawks d sucks all year.. and had people here arguing about how “good” forsling, Gustafson, dahlstrom, Murphy, jokiharu, and koekkoek are.. they’re all complete garbage. Then again, you can’t really play any type of defense anymore aside from stick checks. This is what the “new league” wants tho, I guess. I haven’t seen a single hit this entire game, lol.
Thought this was the gdt lolDid perlini move his feet once there? Get him the **** off the team
I can’t find the thread at the moment, but I’ve been called out more than once for saying the hawks only have one actual defenseman in Keith. Seabs is done, Murphy is mediocre at best, and everyone else is AHL caliber, at best. I’ve been told “I don’t watch games” or know what I’m talking about. It showed tonight. Turnover central, and an 8-7 game that the only reason the hawks won was because of the cat and Kaner.Jokiharju is on the AHL for seasoning and because we acquired Koekkoek in a trade. His is good offensively, top 20 in points this season for a defenseman, but is an adventure in his own zone. Murphy is good defensively, but he and Keith can't do it alone. Forsling and Dahstrom are young and have a chance of being NHLers in the future, but both have issues at this point.
Please provide me evidence that Hawks fans were talking up these guys so much that you felt this comment was needed.
It’s amazing, I’ve said the hawks d sucks all year.. and had people here arguing about how “good” forsling, Gustafson, dahlstrom, Murphy, jokiharu, and koekkoek are.. they’re all complete garbage. Then again, you can’t really play any type of defense anymore aside from stick checks. This is what the “new league” wants tho, I guess. I haven’t seen a single hit this entire game, lol.
I can’t find the thread at the moment, but I’ve been called out more than once for saying the hawks only have one actual defenseman in Keith. Seabs is done, Murphy is mediocre at best, and everyone else is AHL caliber, at best. I’ve been told “I don’t watch games” or know what I’m talking about. It showed tonight. Turnover central, and an 8-7 game that the only reason the hawks won was because of the cat and Kaner.
Who said anything about head shots? I didn’t. Headshots have no place in the league. The problem is, you can’t hit anyone in open ice anymore without a penalty, fine, or suspension. Because your jersey clipped their visor, resulting in “head contact”. I’ve at least seen a few “hits” in the sj/Boston game but if that’s “physicality” then it’s a joke.You can't headshot, which isn't effective D anyways. Jesus, it's like you missed all the clutch and grab from the 90s and only remember highlight hits.
Offensive players have gotten better and bad d-men haven't kept up. Not sure how taking runs at guys would solve that.
Call it out then. He provides some offense at least, but he is a terrible “defenseman”I’ll call you out right here for labeling Gus “AHL caliber”
I know you've been criticized, I've been one of the ones who's critized you and I have damn good reason.I can’t find the thread at the moment, but I’ve been called out more than once for saying the hawks only have one actual defenseman in Keith. Seabs is done, Murphy is mediocre at best, and everyone else is AHL caliber, at best. I’ve been told “I don’t watch games” or know what I’m talking about. It showed tonight. Turnover central, and an 8-7 game that the only reason the hawks won was because of the cat and Kaner.
Who said anything about head shots? I didn’t. Headshots have no place in the league. The problem is, you can’t hit anyone in open ice anymore without a penalty, fine, or suspension. Because your jersey clipped their visor, resulting in “head contact”. I’ve at least seen a few “hits” in the sj/Boston game but if that’s “physicality” then it’s a joke.
“Taking runs” has nothing to do with physicality or playing defense.
The karlsson hit was as clean as it gets, so was Ian coles in Calgary. So was reaves on Wilson. They all paid thousands. Clean hits=suspensions and 5+ a game anymore.Oh come on, you know that's exaggerating. I didn't like the Karlsson suspension, for instance, but the number of suspensions for non-headshot headshots is pretty low. I see zero connection between the crackdown on head contact and the increase in scoring- that's all skill imo.
The karlsson hit was as clean as it gets, so was Ian coles in Calgary. So was reaves on Wilson. They all paid thousands. Clean hits=suspensions and 5+ a game anymore.
There absolutely is a correlation. No hits because you’re worried about a suspension=offensive players skating unimpeded. I can’t tell you how many games I’ve seen this year where someone scores between the dots surrounded by 2-3 opposing players swinging their sticks around instead of actually taking the body. That’s why scoring is up.