1st W for ARI.
1st W after 9L for DET.
Now it will be 1st W after 8L for DAL for sure. No doubt.
We have higher chances tomorrow. Typical Flyers.
For some reason the playoff odd chart does not match my gut feeling.
And it doesn't seem to correlate with the standings either. NJ is 3 points behind with one game in hand. Where does that gap in probability come from?
For some reason the playoff odd chart does not match my gut feeling.
And it doesn't seem to correlate with the standings either. NJ is 3 points behind with one game in hand. Where does that gap in probability come from?
What are the odds the Panthers, Jackets and Devils continue to win out?
I think the stars are favorites...1st W for ARI.
1st W after 9L for DET.
Now it will be 1st W after 8L for DAL for sure. No doubt.
We have higher chances tomorrow. Typical Flyers.
Kind off topic but why is the Dallas Stars forum the least active on this site?
It's pretty dead over there at times, their GDT are lucky to reach 4 or 5 pages.
They are. That's crazy.I think the stars are favorites...
Fun fact: Going off one of last week's topics du jour, Bob Keeshan/Ken Hitchcock/Captain Kangaroo was the first actor to play the clown character on Hakky, I mean Howdy Doody.
Kind off topic but why is the Dallas Stars forum the least active on this site?
It's pretty dead over there at times, their GDT are lucky to reach 4 or 5 pages.
Total football area. The Stars have a small core of fans and with the way the team has been playing of late it is a wonder anyone shows up to the games.
A few years back the board had a falling out with the admin and operators of the forums. The top 20-30 posters left and created a new website.
Has anyone considered he may just be at troll level 10/10 and not an actual Flyers fan?
Nah, he's not a troll. He's an academic and he's trying to prove his points the way you would in an academic paper. There is a guy on the Liverpool board who goes about things (sort of) the same way - you can see the convolutions in the posts, and aside from the faulty hockey logic of them, they are basically brain shrapnel because they are rushed (and also because academic writing is very possibly deeply flawed, but that is for another time and for someone else to bother explaining - even though it's my fault that it got brought up, I'm going to exit the point like the guy who farted on an elevator).
I've written my share of academic papers as well and there is a difference between authors who stretch facts/stats to meet their narrative and those who write peices using data to support their points. The former are careless, never seeking to actually find consistencies/anamolies/breakthroughs but rather have their own ideals they want to push with loosely veiled "research" and "data"