Adrianopolous
Registered User
I think you can tell us something alsoOttawa fans can enlighten you about that.
I think you can tell us something alsoOttawa fans can enlighten you about that.
Almost all of the offensive records were set with an 80-game season. Extending the season to 82 didn't help anyone break offensive records. Goals-per-game affects offensive records, not length of the season. A league with a GPG average of around 6.5 (or higher) will have plenty of players capable of hitting 50 goals and 100 points in a 76-game season. This season the GPG average was 6.0.
Stats in the NBA are not so easy to follow... what part of less 50 goal scorers or less 100 point scorers don't you understand? I know they're just thresholds... but some and are fans of stats, and players as well. Increase to 84 games if you want to ensure the schedule is nice and even...They agreed to go from 84 games to 82 games in 1995.
The NBA commissioner is also on record considering a shorter season. If the NBA moves in that direction, the NHL might follow.
It’s unlikely, but possible.
And these same owners agreeed to shut down an entire season in 2004, losing billions of dollars, and shut down roughly half a season multiple times. They are willing to take short-term hits for long-term gain.
I doubt it happens. Just saying I would personally prefer it.
Seems weird we'd play so many games against the other conference in this set up.
I love hockey season.
Why would I wanna watch 6 fewer games per year?
Goals-per-game affects offensive records, not length of the season.
why make it so much harder to hit 50 goals, let alone break all time records?
How can hockey fans possibly be in favor of less games to watch? I don't get it
I feel like this needs to happen. Look at the Jets. They were so gassed, they couldn't escape round 1. ****s rough out there.
owners wont like it
theyd argue to extend it not lower it
Cleanest is this:
2 against opposite conference for 32 games.
3 against same conference but not division for 24 games
4 against same division for 28, so a total of 84
There wouldn't have been a single 50 goal scorer this season had there only been 76 games... so many of the 50 goal seasons since the NHL has been doing 82 game seasons would have been erased under your proposal... so often players hit 50 in the last few games of the season, 76 games would be a huge disservice to goal scorers and stars looking to break records... and for what exactly? 6 less games a year accomplishes nothing... sorry man, but it's just a silly idea to have less games. If anything they should have kept the 84 game schedule.