well it turned out i won 700$ cause of that marchand goal
I want to take a second and talk about Nolan Patrick. Hockey sense, vision. His hands in around the net are exceptional, whether its a pass like last night or going top shelf off the back hand. His board work is getting a lot better. Flyers center depth figures to be very strong for years to come. It's not all bad.
Is there a point?
The teams play is proving exactly why this WAS the year to stand pat at the deadline...
Nothing he could have done would have fixed the current problems. He 100% did the right thing by doing nothing.
Deadline acquisitions aren't fixing 3 of the 6 D, a starting goalie, and the Filppula line.
Is there a point?
Is there a point?
Is there a point?
Sorry, not sure I know which post you're talking about... I don't remember saying that...You mentioned something earlier Striker about a lot of people swinging wildly (not like that Captain Poulin!) from each side of the season expectation argument but I'd like to think most have had reasonably balanced expectations for this season:
Hak isn't doing the best of jobs with our youth, Hexy can't or won't force his hand with the roster and so a bubble team we are and that was the expectation.
I believe our winning run was demonstrable to be the work of this teams leaders and despite Hak with the majority of the results down to his poor turtling cling on for a point strategy. He has however shown reasonable success in bringing in a steady system overall. I'm repeating myself but this off season (whether we make the 'offs or not) is crucial. Hexy has to allow Flip and Manning to walk and try everything he can to trade Farmer. I would much rather sink with a forward lineup that includes Lindblom, Voro, MV and NAK and a D corp that includes Sanheim, Morin and Myers and then know exactly what we have in these players than barely keep afloat again with a roster that includes a lot of poor players.
Sorry, not sure I know which post you're talking about... I don't remember saying that...
Always with the extremes on this board.
On one side there’s exaggerations from people who act like the coach and GM can never do any wrong.
Then on the other side it’s negative exaggerations.
Both are equally ridiculous and neither side seems to learn their lesson.
Meanwhile most people are in the middle and know that there’s a balance.
Ah ok. Let me clarify.This one? Not a criticism btw just an observation that I hope most had the same bubble expectations for this season
Just showing how Lavi used his players when he didn't have a ridiculously deep roster.
2012-13 was still deeper than the current Flyers, with three solid lines.
He had three solid D-men and three "trash" D-men.
Goalies had a .905 save percentage.
And they had 49 points in 48 games (84 point rate).
So I guess Lavi wasn't a miracle worker.
Couts (#8) and Schenn (#5) were his only "young players."
Voracek (23), Simmonds (24) and Giroux (25) were established players, like Couts today.
So it's hard to say how he'd use the current Flyer youngsters.
I'm not sure I want Vorobyev and Myers starting the season in Philly unless they show they're NHL ready in TC.
This idea you can accelerate a players development by force feeding them NHL minutes is simply hope over experience.
Myers was a late bloomer who didn't get big minutes until his post-nondraft season.
Vorobyev had 80 KHL games in a minor role, Lindblom was a top SHL forward for two seasons.
NAK, Sanheim and Morin should be ready to start next season.
MV has the experience, but does he have the talent?
Frost has the talent and hockey IQ, does he have the body?
I expect Hextall to add a body or two to upgrade the forward depth.
On defense, it's more addition by subtraction as Manning leaves and MacDonald has to fight for a job.
You mean like Ghost?
Notice the guys with the most ES minutes were the "bruisers," Coburn and Schenn.
Maybe the idea that Lavi would use the current players drastically different from Hakstol is just a wet dream?
Like Lavi under utilitizing B Schenn and Couts in favor of veterans?
Or playing less skilled, more physical D-men more ES minutes than his smaller PP specialist?
You mean like Ghost?
Notice the guys with the most ES minutes were the "bruisers," Coburn and Schenn.
Maybe the idea that Lavi would use the current players drastically different from Hakstol is just a wet dream?
Like Lavi under utilitizing B Schenn and Couts in favor of veterans?
Or playing less skilled, more physical D-men more ES minutes than his smaller PP specialist?