BobbyClarkeFan16
Registered User
I also forgot to mention from the first post, EVH!!!! God I miss Ed.
I think the thing with him might be that he's good
Talk about transition.That Walker to Bee to TK for the goal play was amazing. Highlight reel stuff from start to finish. @Beef Invictus have you figured out Farabee yet?
@VladDrag
Fingers crossed he can get back to his offensive numbers from last season. 45 point pace, here we come.
@VladDrag
Fingers crossed he can get back to his offensive numbers from last season. 45 point pace, here we come.
@VladDrag
Fingers crossed he can get back to his offensive numbers from last season. 45 point pace, here we come.
So the middle line that runs down the middle is a z-score of 0. Basically the average for that stat.Serious question, how do you read this? +/- is antiquated and has flaws, but I can look at it and get a reasonable understanding of what is going on. What am I looking for in this chart? Colors? Length of bar? etc....
Tortorella's MO is that rest is for the weak.Ersson kept them in the game in the 1st and they found a way to win. Kudos to them for a very solid effort.
At some point though, Torts is gonna have to give Cal some games in net or he’s gonna kill Ersson. Those games are going to be uglier than Kevin Hayes.
Good win last night against a better opponent. The first was ugly in terms of possession against, but the Flyers did a great job in defensive structure. Florida’s forechecking in the first was all over the Flyers. I don’t think the Flyers played poorly in the first, I just think that Florida was so much better. Ersson was strong early as well.
The second period the flyers came out much better. They were able to sustain more pressure in the o-zone, which mitigated Florida’s forecheck. Much of the same in the 3rd.
All in all - it was a good defensive performance, and got a couple of bounces to go their way.
A few players notes:
-Tip was hot and cold - had some decent chances, made some dumb reads, but they are a better team with him in the lineup. He brings an element that few others bring
-Farabee-Frost-TK line was awesome and should stay together for awhile. The only line that could cycle consistently While Frost was kind of MIA offensively, he was so good in many other areas. Super strong in puck possession
-Walker is awesome in transition.
-I am beginning to see signs of degradation in Couts. Hopefully it’s just a bad month of hockey, but not excited to see this team with a less than 100% Couts. Could also be linemates
- Cates-Poehling-X would be an awesome 4th line. Both Cates and Poehling are strong possession players.
-Finally, I really believe they miss Brink in the offensive zone. He’s one of the few players who really understands the offensive cycle game.
He's gonna mail it in for the next 9 years.All in all - it was a good defensive performance, and got a couple of bounces to go their way.
A few players notes:
-Tip was hot and cold - had some decent chances, made some dumb reads, but they are a better team with him in the lineup. He brings an element that few others bring
I can explain it - he's not a Torts type of player.So who wants to defend/explain the Lycksell scratching?
He’s not good?So who wants to defend/explain the Lycksell scratching?
Off his last couple games, he's probably as good as Laughton and Hathaway, but on the road in Florida, you're throwing him to the wolves (i.e., going to struggle with their style of play).He’s not good?
So, they just going to shelter him forever? Why not let him get used to those type of games in a rebuilding year? Or is it because they aren't really rebuilding?Off his last couple games, he's probably as good as Laughton and Hathaway, but on the road in Florida, you're throwing him to the wolves (i.e., going to struggle with their style of play).
They're basically going with three lines, two older players in Couts and Atkinson, so they really are committing to the kids. I think if Lycksell continues to play well, he'll gradually increase his PT, but doubt they see him as a core player going forward, more in the bottom six mix with Desnoyers, Avon, and Tuomaala.
You yourself said he's as good as Hathaway. Why in a rebuild do you not play the younger Lycksell instead of Hathaway to get him used to the hard more physical competition?Given the TDL, who are you going to bench with only a month left and lower their value?
And yes, competing for a PO spot (without sacrificing assets to do so) is part of rebuilding, it's about developing and evaluating your young core.
Lycksell is 24, and has yet to win a job, he's not part of the core.
Whereas Brink is 22 and played ahead of him b/c he has far more upside.
You want to lose a shot at the playoffs to give Lycksell a chance to get beat up on the road?You yourself said he's as good as Hathaway. Why in a rebuild do you not play the younger Lycksell instead of Hathaway to get him used to the hard more physical competition?
Oh that's right they don't want to lose the game to let the kid learn.
Yeah they are rebuilding.....
Masochism? You just totally dismissed the kids chances by not playing him over players he's better than. Just send his ass back to LHV now if you aren't going to use him at the NHL level because you don't want him pushed around. Oh wait AHL tends to be more physical. Send him to Europe.You want to lose a shot at the playoffs to give Lycksell a chance to get beat up on the road?
That's not rebuilding, that's just masochism!
Torts stuck with Brink during a full month in which he totally sucked.
But with Brink, there's enough upside that you'll be patient. Same way Torts is sticking with Zamula.
I don't see that kind of upside with Lycksell.
He's more in the Laczynski, Allison camp, "the future is now."