We already knew of three, right? Yet the McKenzie poll had him outside the top ten.
I think when one says they "looked hard" it doesn't mean they were actually going to take him at the podium if the draft before them went differently.
It doesn't seem that abnormal to me for teams picking in the late 10's to look at guys more projected publicly in the 11-20 range, especially to see if the consensus is wrong. Due diligence, etc.
And of course the premium position factor.
I'm sure many players who went later than 10 were considered, probably even strongly by a few teams. Especially with how divergent the various draft reporters said team's lists were. They just didn't get picked that high so no one is going around asking about where they were looked at.