Taking into consideration what Stamkos is paid;
Kucherov > Stamkos
It's pretty logical unless he does something crazy and takes less, that 9 is probably minimum.
You think he's just gonna resign for 7M because you think he's been bad this postseason? Ha. Keep dodging my other points about players not performing every round. I'm still waiting on your response there. Don't worry, use Google, Bing, etc and see if you can compile something post 2005 (to make it easier on you) of a player dominating series after series.
There's a reason you're not responding with any substance other than jabs and failed humor. You picked a losing fight. It's like arguing any top player in the league, mid 20s, from any era doesn't warrant top dollar when hes the best in his position, best offensive talent on his team, etc. And currently doing it for 4.7M.
Keep going though. I'm not done laughing yet.