I will say your dedication to your established points of view is creditable. There are few I've encountered to adhere to opinions even when evidence flies in their face. This methodology is certain to produce accurate results at least some of the time.
What "evidence"?
People base this
stellar "reputation" on his
multiple Vezina wins. He has won these trophies because of
"HIS" stats. The thing is this,
"HIS" numbers/stats are AFFECTED GREATLY by the team in front of him. Not only the players and how good they are, but also HOW THEY PLAY STYLISTICALLY. How much impact do you think Hitchcock and his style of play had on Mason winning the Calder? This idea that he has been
CARRYING the CBJ in any way, whether now, 16/17, or 12/13, is bogus.
I wont take too much away from him winning in a lockout year, but the fact is, its ONLY "half" a season. And, take a quick look at the 12/13 team. Look at the BIG group of 2 way/responsible guys at the top of the points list. Look at who the player/defenseman was that led in +/-. Dubinsky-Letestu-Anisimov-Mackenzie defensive center depth.
Columbus Blue Jackets 2012-13 roster and scoring statistics at hockeydb.com
A look deeper into the "team" shows that they missed the PO's by 1 point. 120 GF/119 GA. The 119 against ranked tied for 10th, the 120 scored ranked 25th. So what does all of this tell/show us? That the team couldn't score so they needed Bob to save their asses? Or that the team, led by a group of two-way, veterans and/or defensively responsible players, played a structured defensive style that significantly impacted their goalie and teams goals against numbers while giving themselves the best chance to win?