3rd Wild Goal vs Jets doesn't go in the net

Status
Not open for further replies.

Arthur*

Guest
If this were a real controversy, wouldn't we have more angles by now?
 

RapidFire

Registered User
Jan 3, 2007
2,818
122
Yeah, definitely in:

9wRWwVp.jpg
 

Vipers31

Advanced Stagnostic
Aug 29, 2008
20,365
2,126
Cologne, Germany
Even by the OP's angle, it's pretty clearly in. Even if the puck hit the crossbar at a weird angle, at that speed and angle it would be physically impossible to lose that much speed and deflect to that direction. It clearly hit the camera/back bar.
 

melinko

Registered User
Jun 13, 2010
6,730
191
Minnesota
There was an angle from the FSN broadcast that showed the shot from behind Spurgeon, zoomed in on the deflection I'm pretty sure. It might have a better view if someone has it recorded.

I didn't even know this goal was questionable while watching the game.
 

Fish on The Sand

Untouchable
Feb 28, 2002
60,258
1,973
Canada
It definitely hit the camera. You can see the water bottle move on top of the net, which it wouldn't do if it was the crossbar.

edit: the gif proves it even moreso.
 
Last edited:

684

Registered User
Jun 15, 2014
3,006
0
Clearly in. Doubt they would ever get something that obvious wrong.
 

Billy Mays Here*

Guest
Was at the game and it clearly went in. Another telling sign was that there was never a ping, meaning it never hit the cross bar initially.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad