BringBackHakstol
Registered User
I'm definitely concerned that hak is not going to figure out this bottom 6. VDV and PEB are beyond proven to be feeble at this point. I always liked PEB but he really is not a good player
The ultimate lineup optimization would be this imo:
Read - Schenn - Weise
Leier - Cousins - Lyubimov
Or
Read - Cousins - Schenn
Leier - Lyubimov - Weise
Neither will even happen though unfortunately. As it's going to take an injury to one of Bellemare or VandeVelde to come out of the lineup.
So it's looking like I wasn't wrong to be cool with keeping Gagner another year.
So it's looking like I wasn't wrong to be cool with keeping Gagner another year.
I think Hextall felt that they needed a big grinding Hatcher type player which is why they signed Weise who has not lived up to expectations.
There is zero chance we make the playoffs without Hextall modifying the D in some way. ZERO.
Were basically losing ~15 goals a season because our bottom six sucks.
Having no-one on pace for over 30pts amongst the bottom six forwards production wise is pretty bad.
And when you examine it it sure seems like the centres causing it mainly... the winger numbers are not great, but they are not awful like the centres relative to good teams at those positions.
You'd think the Hak line got 17 minutes rather than 7 based on this thread.
Insane. Not sure what else people want out of PEB specifically
I'm definitely concerned that hak is not going to figure out this bottom 6. VDV and PEB are beyond proven to be feeble at this point. I always liked PEB but he really is not a good player
Insane. Not sure what else people want out of PEB specifically
They want more points which is fair enough when he's being used as a 2c/3C, but he's not anymore. Last night's lineup with ES ice times.
Raffl(16:31)-Giroux(18:22)-Voracek(18:34)
Leier(11:10)-Schenn-(13:39)-Simmonds(13:55)
Cousins(10:58)-Couturier(13:58)-Weise(14:40)
VdV(7:04)-Bellemare(7:31)-Gordon(5:52)
I wouldn't have benched Konecny, I would have tried him at RW with Coots and dropped Weise to 4RW, but clearly the main issue last night was the zero goals generated by the top 9. Not a 4th line that barely got on the ice.
They want more points which is fair enough when he's being used as a 2c/3C, but he's not anymore. Last night's lineup with ES ice times.
Raffl(16:31)-Giroux(18:22)-Voracek(18:34)
Leier(11:10)-Schenn-(13:39)-Simmonds(13:55)
Cousins(10:58)-Couturier(13:58)-Weise(14:40)
VdV(7:04)-Bellemare(7:31)-Gordon(5:52)
I wouldn't have benched Konecny, I would have tried him at RW with Coots and dropped Weise to 4RW, but clearly the main issue last night was the zero goals generated by the top 9. Not a 4th line that barely got on the ice.
I don't know how you can watch that goal and think it is mainly on Giroux.
Everyone should 'shuffle' over in effect. Provorov had his man, Giroux was going to the trailer like a center should, AMac should have gone to the man on the other side, or at least got into the lane between!
Giroux's only fault was he did not realise AMac's folly early enough, so when he tried to make up for the initial play came up short, as he did not have enough time to get there then.
It is pretty infuriating in any sport when you have to go twice the distance you should to someone who is not technically 'your' man on the play when if everyone had shuffled across like they should it is two people going a similar distance instead of one going the distance for both.
His consistent refusal to drop the Wonder Twins has a ripple effect on the lineup, though, and that's where the problem with them comes in. We all know they are a limited black hole of a pair offensively, they're not world-beaters defensively, and when he slots them in game after game without end, better players have to sit, players who have the potential - only slightly better than the pair of them, but better - to score. These problems are exaggerated by all of us, of course, and that's because we are frustrated that we don't have better players yet. There is that old expression "You can only beat the team that is in front of you" - for us, it's "You can only b**** about the players in front of you." When they are gone, we will find someone else to b**** about because that's the nature of passionate, hot-blooded people following something passionately. But that doesn't mean that they aren't a detriment to us now, because they are.