devilsblood
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2010
- 29,569
- 11,842
ANDERSSON was picked at 7 and is much more physically developed. Give Boquist some time to fill out before you dismiss him.
I didn't dismiss Boqvist, just the idea that his #'s are comparable.
I didn't miss his point. But you have to give Andersson the credit for earning more minutes and producing in those minutes.You completely missed his point.
Andersson got PP time and a lot more ice time than Boqvist. Andersson is also a lot more polished which is likely why he got that time versus a smaller, skilled guy like Boqvist.
Obviously Andersson playing an important role on a SHL team as a draft eligible player is very impressive, but Boqvist's production when looked at as a production rate shows real potential for a diamond in the rough pick.
Regardless, they're not good prospects to compare to each other. They're very different types of players who will fulfill very different roles. Andersson looks to be your reliable all-situations player whereas Boqvist has the potential to be an offensive force.
A decent P/60 is not that impressive if you barely play.
And yeah Andersson went way higher so maybe it's not a fair comparison, but I did not originate the comparison.