It seems like this team, and I am including the 2011 year when they won the Cup, oscillates between periods of complete dominance and periods of complete complacency.
We have seen what their dominant stretches can result in (a championship), and when they are on their game, they are as tough to beat as any team in the league. But when they are off their game, they're as beatable as any team in the league.
So, I have two questions: why the inconsistency? And, is this team's model and team's core, sustainable for championship level play year in and year out?
Or, are they too reliant on playing perfect system hockey, playing extremely physically and emotionally engaged, and playing with a hot goalie?
Claude has proven that he can win with his system, but this team does not seem capable of falling back on its skill when they system breaks down, or when they are not executing their system to a T. They are also less effective when they are not playing with controlled emotion and controlled physicality. But what team, when relying on that emotion and physicality to win, can bring that game every night, and over consistent stretches of an entire season? And lastly, can a team win consistently when they rely on their goaltender to play at a Vezina level in order to have success?
The system, as we have seen, is also compromised when the depth of the team is compromised.
Part of that falls on Chia because he never plugged the holes vacated by Ryder and Recchi, but part of it has been a failure of the coaching staff to adjust to the realities of a different type of line-up.
I don't know, maybe Seguin isn't the guy I think he is...maybe he is not a guy who should be getting 20+ a game, but when you have a third line that has consisted of Bourque, Pandolfo, Caron, etc. over the course of the season, isn't it imperative to have your skilled players logging the majority of the ice time?
If you have less depth, why not ride your top lines and players a bit more? And part of this is on the players, if not the majority of it. Claude could have ridden the Krejci line more heavily, but what have they been most of this year?
I don't know. I just think the Bruins have been a team that relies too heavily on their system, their depth, and their goaltending, and when those things aren't clicking, Chia hasn't put a talented enough roster on the ice to make up the difference, not to mention the coach doesn't necessarily put his skilled players in the best position to use that skill. But the players deserve the blame for not executing the coache's system consistently and not bringing the emotional intensity they need to win on a consistent enough basis.