Prospect Info: 2023 Pick 26 LW Quentin Musty

[LadyStanley]

 

[LadyStanley]

 

[mogambomoroo]

Musty will be a force, he is going to be such a pain in the ass to play against when he is fully developed. I think this is crazy that we have that kind of a player in our prospect pool right now.

 

[Alaskanice]

Musty vs. Mactavish for years!!

 

[themelkman]

From what I have heard he isn’t really a huge physical presence despite the size.

 

[Gecklund]

From what I have heard he isn’t really a huge physical presence despite the size.

Yeah that’s right. He isn’t. He’s physical like Timo was physical. He’s not throwing his body around but he’s strong and hard to push off the puck. He can and will use his strength to get to the net. He will get in front of the net and get in scrums. He’s not going to be chasing hits though which I’ll be honest I don’t want my top 6 forwards doing anyway,

 

[themelkman]

Yeah that’s right. He isn’t. He’s physical like Timo was physical. He’s not throwing his body around but he’s strong and hard to push off the puck. He can and will use his strength to get to the net. He will get in front of the net and get in scrums. He’s not going to be chasing hits though which I’ll be honest I don’t want my top 6 forwards doing anyway,

Yeah that’s perfect. Not interested in guys like that because most of the time coaches will play that up instead of building the other aspects of their game

 

[CanadienShark]

Don't know much about him, but he's a name I've heard a lot of. I'm cautiously very optimistic.

 

[Alaskanice]

On Shengs site, a scout told him that he knows that teams were trying to trade up to get Musty. Good information.

 

[Hodge]

No idea what this is based on but Musty looks very promising.

 

[gaucholoco3]

I do see a high floor with Musty. I also like how well he complements our other top prospects. A solid pick at 26.

 

[Levie]

No idea what this is based on but Musty looks very promising.

Why doesn't it say "First line" and "Second line" or is there a Top 6 position which is not First line but also not 2nd line. Confusing.

 

[Shark Finn]

Why doesn't it say "First line" and "Second line" or is there a Top 6 position which is not First line but also not 2nd line. Confusing.

When you're worse than the top-line winger at your wing position but better than the other top-line winger on the off-wing? So basically the second best winger who's on the second line due to being the "wrong" wing

 

[tiburon12]

Why doesn't it say "First line" and "Second line" or is there a Top 6 position which is not First line but also not 2nd line. Confusing.

I read it as this, and will use wingers as examples

1st line - Top player (Rantanen)
Top 6 - effective complement on either scoring line (E. Kane)
Bottom 6 - Good 3rd liner who might have reduced minutes on a deep team, can;'t hang in offense-heavy roles (Goodrow)
Replacement - Tops out at 4th line (Reaves)

 

[Levie]

I read it as this, and will use wingers as examples

1st line - Top player (Rantanen)
Top 6 - effective complement on either scoring line (E. Kane)
Bottom 6 - Good 3rd liner who might have reduced minutes on a deep team, can;'t hang in offense-heavy roles (Goodrow)
Replacement - Tops out at 4th line (Reaves)

Evander Kane should be considered a 1st line winger.

 

[OrrNumber4]

Evander Kane should be considered a 1st line winger.

If you're a contending team, having Kane as a top-line winger is a bit of a gamble...

 

[tiburon12]

Evander Kane should be considered a 1st line winger.

Idk, he has the skills to be but he never has produced over 60pts for various reasons. Hard to say that's top line production