Yeah, I think the biggest take away from this draft for the Canucks, is that they aren't rewarded with a surplus of picks when they're playing poorly and so every pick is pulled apart at the seams and argued to death.
It's always a crap shoot and it's very likely a lot of these players don't go on to do much in the league. The more picks you have, the better your chances of hitting (duh), but we've got a franchise that would rather swim upstream in this regard. Doing the opposite of what everyone else thinks is sensible can actually work at times. It's just rare that it does. Being buyers at a point when doing so is the most costly, or trading your first and second round draft picks when you're among the worst teams in the league is poor risk management.
I'm certainly not against spending draft capital, but getting it back is important for a number of reasons. You can argue if the Avs and Blues picked the right players, but they did well with trades and drafting today while both are adapting to their circumstances.
Doing the opposite of what everyone else thinks is sensible can actually work at times. It's just rare.
Plus, I'd say that a big part of supporing a sports team is the draft and following the transition of those players into the league. It builds a strong bond with the club and invites younger fans to get involved. I think clubs neglect this aspect at their peril.
It’s too bad the Leafs ruined Frankly Colorado’s development. I thought he could have been a decent defence man.
That's close to what I thought I was reading when I first saw the post. lol