Someone has to be the whipping boy. It will either be Holl or Chiarot -- though I think Chiarot not playing with Seider will take some heat off of him.By TDL time, Justin Holl will have Olli Maatta type love. As in the majority of the fan base will think nothing of him on the blueline.
In short, the griping about his contract and his play will be limited to the same type of subset that bitched about the Debrincat trade (not necessarily the same guys, but a similarly very vocal minority)
I assume it’ll still be Chiarot.Someone has to be the whipping boy. It will either be Holl or Chiarot -- though I think Chiarot not playing with Seider will take some heat off of him.
I thought we were going bold here!Fabbri plays less than 45 games.
Andrew Copp has a 20g 35a season.
I'm expecting 15 goals, 40 points for him and that Compher bumps Copp down to the 3rd line.
I'm curious about this take. As several have posted the same in various threads since Compher's addition.I'm expecting 15 goals, 40 points for him and that Compher bumps Copp down to the 3rd line.
I'm curious about this take. As several have posted the same in various threads since Compher's addition.
What in either player's history would lead you to believe there is any material difference between them?
View attachment 730398
They are the same size.
Less than a year apart in age.
Came from the same college team.
Copp is better at face-offs
Copp is more physical yet takes far fewer penalties
Compher blocks more shots
Compher's teams have been better offensively and defensively yet he's got a significantly lower +/- than Copp (Copp was +2 playing 82 games for us!!).
Compher has a slightly better shooting percentage.
Copp is a marginally (.03 PPG) better point producer from the time since both became established NHLers ('17-'18 season).
They both hit 50+ when they had one season next to talent. Compher 52 with Rantanen and Copp 53 driven largely by post-TDL with Panarin.
Copp had a stronger post-season with the Rangers than Compher ever had.
There has to be something to this hunch that several people are having, but I can't for the life of me find it.
If it's a case of "I don't know, just a hunch" cool, I'm just curious as you're not the only one. I suspect it's a case of "Copp was a Wing, he's bad, this other guy has to be better" but really it's a case of "JT Compher? We have JT Compher at home already"
I'm curious about this take. As several have posted the same in various threads since Compher's addition.
What in either player's history would lead you to believe there is any material difference between them?
View attachment 730398
They are the same size.
Less than a year apart in age.
Came from the same college team.
Copp is better at face-offs
Copp is more physical yet takes far fewer penalties
Compher blocks more shots
Compher's teams have been better offensively and defensively yet he's got a significantly lower +/- than Copp (Copp was +2 playing 82 games for us!!).
Compher has a slightly better shooting percentage.
Copp is a marginally (.03 PPG) better point producer from the time since both became established NHLers ('17-'18 season).
They both hit 50+ when they had one season next to talent. Compher 52 with Rantanen and Copp 53 driven largely by post-TDL with Panarin.
Copp had a stronger post-season with the Rangers than Compher ever had.
There has to be something to this hunch that several people are having, but I can't for the life of me find it.
If it's a case of "I don't know, just a hunch" cool, I'm just curious as you're not the only one. I suspect it's a case of "Copp was a Wing, he's bad, this other guy has to be better" but really it's a case of "JT Compher? We have JT Compher at home already"