Speculation: 2023-2024 General Lightning Discussion - Thread title week to week on IR

Status
Not open for further replies.

RussianGuyovich

Hella Ennui
Jan 2, 2007
9,820
8,215
i mean, ...i care about syracuse winning. a winning formula in the minors cultivates a winning development program for player growth and experience in the postseason. not to mention veteran leadership as well as mentoring.

why wouldn't we want syracuse to win? who's spot is he taking up? super weird take.
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,215
23,348
NB
i mean, ...i care about syracuse winning. a winning formula in the minors cultivates a winning development program for player growth and experience in the postseason. not to mention veteran leadership as well as mentoring.

why wouldn't we want syracuse to win? who's spot is he taking up? super weird take.
Yeah. I think it's worth more to have a top scorer in Syracuse than a 13th F. He's a.warm body here, easily replaceable. Not so much there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DistantThunderRep

JFleegs

Registered User
Dec 9, 2010
4,733
2,876
Virginia Beach
There have been countless ahl stars who couldn’t stick in the NHL. Doesn’t mean they didn’t deserve their spot on an AHL squad. It is not a strictly developmental league and a winning culture is huge.

Back in the day I had season tickets to the BSens we loved Denis Hamel, amazing Ahl player, 50 goal scorer, just couldn’t make it in the Nhl. Some guys just have to make a career in the A and help teams win and be a vet presence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFC

These Are The Days

Oh no! We suck again!!
May 17, 2014
34,538
20,374
Tampa Bay
NHL scheduling is a joke. Opening night at 5:00 EDT, then the Bolts have 3 day break and then 6 in 8 days, including a road back to back.
That will never stop. But they've had like the last 6 months off. They are more than ready to handle it. These last 3-4 years it didn't matter if they had 2 weeks off. They were somehow still always the most tired team in the league
 

Felonious Python

Minor League Degenerate
Aug 20, 2004
30,823
8,927
Lightning HOF voting is up.
 

OffBy1

Registered User
Aug 5, 2021
458
492
In the first game, Paul got over 6 minutes of PP time vs Cirelli's 1.5 min. Cirelli got 3.5 min of PK time vs Paul's 51 seconds. Given that, I'd expect Paul to be skating with offensive wingers like Hagel and Stamkos, and Cirelli to be skating with Eyssimont and Watson. Cooper often uses the Cirelli line to shut down the opposing team's first line, which Stamkos isn't suited for, and he and Cirelli have displayed 0 chemistry since Cirelli has been on the team. Why continue to pair them together? I'd rather see Stamkos on the third with Paul at this point.
 

JFleegs

Registered User
Dec 9, 2010
4,733
2,876
Virginia Beach
In the first game, Paul got over 6 minutes of PP time vs Cirelli's 1.5 min. Cirelli got 3.5 min of PK time vs Paul's 51 seconds. Given that, I'd expect Paul to be skating with offensive wingers like Hagel and Stamkos, and Cirelli to be skating with Eyssimont and Watson. Cooper often uses the Cirelli line to shut down the opposing team's first line, which Stamkos isn't suited for, and he and Cirelli have displayed 0 chemistry since Cirelli has been on the team. Why continue to pair them together? I'd rather see Stamkos on the third with Paul at this point.
You are right Paul and Cirelli switched makes sense
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,215
23,348
NB
In the first game, Paul got over 6 minutes of PP time vs Cirelli's 1.5 min. Cirelli got 3.5 min of PK time vs Paul's 51 seconds. Given that, I'd expect Paul to be skating with offensive wingers like Hagel and Stamkos, and Cirelli to be skating with Eyssimont and Watson. Cooper often uses the Cirelli line to shut down the opposing team's first line, which Stamkos isn't suited for, and he and Cirelli have displayed 0 chemistry since Cirelli has been on the team. Why continue to pair them together? I'd rather see Stamkos on the third with Paul at this point.
I dont think we will see a true shutdown line until playoff time, so I wouldn't bet on it. Paul is simply in Killer's place on the PP but with a different role.

I think you're reading too much into it. At some point we might see Paul bumped into more of an ES scoring role, but Coop has to find Cirelli's minutes somewhere for now.
 

The Gongshow

Fire JBB
Jul 17, 2014
25,814
8,297
Toronto
Cirelli and Stamkos have never worked and will continue not to work. Two completely different games that don't mix well.

Stamkos needs a playmaker center/Winger while he looks for open space and is the trigger man.
Cirelli is a defensive specialist with decent speed but not great playmaking. Good grinder and isn't affraid to crash the net.

Both have their functions, Idk why Coop keeps going back to it
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,215
23,348
NB
Cirelli and Stamkos have never worked and will continue not to work. Two completely different games that don't mix well.

Stamkos needs a playmaker center/Winger while he looks for open space and is the trigger man.
Cirelli is a defensive specialist with decent speed but not great playmaking. Good grinder and isn't affraid to crash the net.

Both have their functions, Idk why Coop keeps going back to it
I think it's because he wants both in the top six. Stamkos works best with Point and Kucherov, but who wouldn't?

I agree, dont get me wrong. I'd rather see a bit of scoring throughout the line up. Point and Kucherov have been our most consistent duo, whereas Stamkos/Kuch often drift into "too cute" territory. So unless Coop wants to drop either Stamkos or Cirelli out of the top six, it gets pretty hard to play them apart.

I love depth. But Coop does seem to move guys up and down the lineup based on their value to the team. That's also why it's been pretty hard for young players to crack the top six without an injury clearing the way.
 

Sky04

Registered User
Jan 8, 2009
29,202
18,367
We did let him go elsewhere. That's what waivers are. Nobody wanted him. For free.

No, they tried to sneak him through waivers quietly... if they wanted to let someone pick him up then they would've sent him down during before teams locked up their rosters.
 

bov

Registered User
Nov 13, 2010
7,211
3,338
No, they tried to sneak him through waivers quietly... if they wanted to let someone pick him up then they would've sent him down during before teams locked up their rosters.
He has been exposed to waivers multiple times, there's nothing sneaky going on at all. If an NHL team thought he was worth having, they'd pick him up, simple as that. Acting like ABB is some kind of hostage in the organization is absurd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JFleegs

The Gongshow

Fire JBB
Jul 17, 2014
25,814
8,297
Toronto
Glad JBB prioritized Tanner "4th line pylon, 10 minutes a night, doesn't even fight or hit now" Jeannot over Steven Stamkos
 

Todd1a

Kucherov or prospect
Jun 19, 2014
16,624
2,858
orlando, fl
You got to bite the bullet and trade for someone like

PETR MRÁZEK​

Have the hawks retain 50 percent of the money and give them Myers, tomkins and a 2nd rounder. Waive ABB and JO Jo when vasy comes back . You can’t run these goalies out there another 20 games. 1st game we won JO Jo allowed 3 goals last night we scored 4 goals and lost and then tomkins allows 4 goals tonight. You’re not going to win nhl game’s allowing 3-4 goals per game that’s just impossible to overcome.
 

Sky04

Registered User
Jan 8, 2009
29,202
18,367
You got to bite the bullet and trade for someone like

PETR MRÁZEK​

Have the hawks retain 50 percent of the money and give them Myers, tomkins and a 2nd rounder. Waive ABB and JO Jo when vasy comes back . You can’t run these goalies out there another 20 games. 1st game we won JO Jo allowed 3 goals last night we scored 4 goals and lost and then tomkins allows 4 goals tonight. You’re not going to win nhl game’s allowing 3-4 goals per game that’s just impossible to overcome.

Trading for goalies isn't going to solve the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoek
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad