Lafleurs Guy
Guuuuuuuy!
- Jul 20, 2007
- 75,635
- 45,789
I think Ghule could be a beast…To be fair Sergachev was twice the prospect they were. On the subject of Guhle, I think Manson is a very good comparable to him, solid D.
I think Ghule could be a beast…To be fair Sergachev was twice the prospect they were. On the subject of Guhle, I think Manson is a very good comparable to him, solid D.
What a great game. It showed me a lesson, to love my ennemies! Unbelievable how resilient the Lightning is. The ilk of champions. I'm still rooting for the Avs and won't complain about getting more games for free. This is the clash of the titans!
They‘re definitely in that Leafs/Bruins territory for me, I started loathing that team in 2004 and the sentiment has been following me ever since lol, last year was just a little extra motivation to hate them even moreYeah, I didn't like it either, but I mean I don't think as far as cheering for another team in the playoffs there are any rules, unless its like Boston or the Leafs.
A beast yes, but not a 40 pts in his rookie season beast.I think Ghule could be a beast…
They‘re definitely in that Leafs/Bruins territory for me, I started loathing that team in 2004 and the sentiment has been following me ever since lol
Even now I don't think it was a bad deal at the moment.Sergachev for Drouin. Deal made by professionnals.
Why are you, as an habs fan, rooting for the BOLTS?
Right below them for me.They‘re definitely in that Leafs/Bruins territory for me, I started loathing that team in 2004 and the sentiment has been following me ever since lol, last year was just a little extra motivation to hate them even more
They are the opposite of an underdog lmaoI like the underdog,
3 times in a row would be crazy, we would not see that again in our lifetime.
Even now I don't think it was a bad deal at the moment.
Hindsight is great...
Ok but Tampa’s a pretty great team to have your rookie season with…A beast yes, but not a 40 pts in his rookie season beast.
They are the opposite of an underdog lmao
Right below them for me.
Sens
Bruins
Leafs
Bolts
NYR
Wpg
They are the opposite of an underdog lmao
Drouin was viewed as a highly-skilled forward able to produce points.How?
Sergachev won dman lf the year at 17 among a small list of players.
6ft3, fast, offensive dman, can do it all.....
Even now I don't think it was a bad deal at the moment.
Hindsight is great...
MacKinnon has definitely not been mighty.Not against the speedy Avs with the mighty MacKinnon, and the boy wonder Bobby Orr lookalike Makar, etc, etc.
Drouin's career was derailed by injuries and personal stuff and so on.It was a bad deal the way we decided to not add to that deal. Said it then. Say it now.
Also, hindsight is actually what decides who keeps their job or not. Lack of results are always in hindsight. And people lose their job because of the end result. I don't get the whole let's not judge on hindsight...That's just how you know if somebody worked or not.
In the end, a deal is great when you actually don't empty one pocket to fill another one. Like..what the Avs did on the Lehky trade. No matter how Barron will turn out, Avs have enough of good d-men to not care. We didn,t have that for Montreal.
Drouin was viewed as a highly-skilled forward able to produce points.
Again, when that trade was made it got a majority of a good deal.
So it's kinda dumb to blame the management for pulling the trigger IMO.
I never was liked the deal, although I still like Drouin as a person and am rooting for him to have a come back. The Habs needed a defenseman and Sergachev was lined up to replace Markov. Bergevin didn't see Sergachev's potential, all he saw was a lanky kid who couldn't play proper defense at training camp. He didn't treat him like a top 10 pick. And get bough the hype and drank the Cool-Aid. I stopped watching the Habs when that trade happened, I couldn't stand such amateurism from Bergerin. Couldn't even sign Radulov, which would have been logical since you're packing the team for the following year by trading a blue chip prospect you don't believe in.
Come on man! We didn't f***ing trade the next Lidstrom for Cedric Paquette! Geez...I never liked the deal, although I still like Drouin as a person and am rooting for him to have a come back. The Habs needed a defenseman and Sergachev was lined up to replace Markov. They got lucky when he fell to them at the draft and I was so scared Bergevin wouldn't draft him even still because he usually likes meatballs better. Bergevin didn't see Sergachev's potential, all he saw was a lanky kid who couldn't play proper defense at training camp. He didn't treat him like a top 10 pick. He bough Drouin's hype and drank the Cool-Aid. I stopped watching the Habs when that trade happened, I couldn't stand such amateurism from Bergerin. Couldn't even sign Radulov, which would have been logical since you're packing the team for the following year by trading a blue chip prospect you don't believe in.
When the deal happened I was kinda excited, because I always just hope for the best with a new player. It's kinda fun to see what the new guy could do. But before that when people would talk about the possibility of acquiring Drouin, I was always kind of wary of it. There was talk of him having issues a couple years before we got him.
Come on man! We didn't f***ing trade the next Lidstrom for Cedric Paquette! Geez...
Did you ever play in a competitive sport? They will all tell you that silver medal is by far the worst. Losing 3 times in a row is never easy in a long playoff run.
Right, Cedric Paquette is still in the league... lol.Come on man! We didn't f***ing trade the next Lidstrom for Cedric Paquette! Geez...