Pinning the blame on the loss on Fiala is unfair, but no more unfair than blaming Ottawa or Anaheim’s issues on players because one thinks it makes the Kings somehow look better for the picks they made. And that happens literally every time those players are brought up, often by the same people now defending Fiala.
Hockey is not the type of sport where wins and especially losses can be blamed on one player. Fiala was a positive for the Kings this season, especially on the PP. People can dispute the long-term outlook of the trade, but he was a very good player for the Kings this season. The only thing a bit concerning will be committing the type of money they have committed to him and will have to with Gabe based on production mostly done against lesser opponents 5 on 5. The modern NHL is about having 3 scoring lines, and for the first time on a really long time, the Kings had one. Which was awesome, but I am worried what happens when AK eventually slows down and teams shift their focus to Fiala, Vilardi and whoever is centering them. A problem that unfortunately will be a reality sooner or later due to the Kings inability to find even 2nd liners as of now with either of those top 5 picks.
I have doubts that those two can make up a 1st line on a good team and they obviously won’t be checkers. So it kind of locks them in as the 3rd scoring line, but who besides Kempe projects to be a viable 1st liner going forward?