I like LaCombe more then Thrun since he still is so new to the position. I think his upside is higher.
They are close for me though.
They are close for me though.
I think as well that LaCombe has a higher ceiling but also longer road to reach it. Right now I have more faith in Thrun but I'm quite certain that LaCombe will reach the NHLI like LaCombe more then Thrun since he still is so new to the position. I think his upside is higher.
They are close for me though.
I think he may have at times. But he was playing PK and in the top 4 on a pretty stacked team, and he never looked out of place. Lacombe definitely has more upside if he hits it, since his tools are better. But I think Thrun at worst is an NHL player, and could easily be a 3 or a 4 if he hits his potential.And wasn't Thrun playing his off-side at WJC too?
I think I have the opposite of recency bias... I like Thrun because he's shown a little more.