missingmika
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2006
- 4,521
- 1,831
Well maybe you should have hoped a little harder you idiot because not only was it a blowout, the Bills easily won.
*Bills won historically:
Well maybe you should have hoped a little harder you idiot because not only was it a blowout, the Bills easily won.
Pats did their best today to replicate the Kelly-Marv era super bowl losses for sure.Well you may of owned us. For 2 decades but when the games mattered we owned your punk asses!
Patriots lack explosive offensive weapons. Their WR are fine in the shorter to intermediate routes. But, that's been the Pats offence since Moss left town, so upwards of a decade now with this current offence. And WR is not a position that the Patriots develop in house, similiar to the Ravens who are also a top 3-5 run organization.Pats in clear transition after letting Brady go. Mac isn't the answer now but could be in the future.
They've done a poor job of drafting and developing outside WR threats. The Ravens are basically in the same boat. Hollywood Brown isn't a WR1 over these past 3 years of him in the NFL. That's why they spent another first on Bateman and I'm not sure he's one either. Their best WR over the past decade was Smith SR from Carolina and Mike Wallace, who was more a vertical threat or Derrick Mason from TEN if you go back even further? Like NE, their best passiing options had been Heap, Pitta, and now Andrews at TE.It was a foundational year for the Patriots. You don’t like getting shitkicked to a division rival in the playoffs, but you have to see the forest through the trees. Clearly receivers will be the target in the draft. At least it should be, who knows with Belichick.
Haha touche. Obviously was a joke and we will never come close to replicating what the Pats have done this century but man that was fun!Pats did their best today to replicate the Kelly-Marv era super bowl losses for sure.