If you actually think a team (any team) would go into the playoffs with the mindset of having the kids play is more important that winning, you know absolutely nothing about the game. It's absurd.
Why are those things mutually exclusive? I feel like that's the biggest fallacy in this whole conversation.
No one is advocating for 20 minutes of Byfield or anything, I just want Kopitar to be able to be Kopitar AND the kids to learn by TM doing the bare minimum for an NHL coach and playing more than 2 lines.
3 forwards had 3, 5, and 7 minutes.
3 forwards had 10, 10, 13 minutes.
the top 6 had 18, 18, 19,
23, 25, and nearly 26 minutes.
I'm not oblivious. I think it was Ferraro today during the OT Rangers/Penguins who said you can't really care about minutes in the long run, you have a game to win right in front of you and you can worry about the next night on the next night. But it's TM's job to jump start some of these guys, too. Not gonna be effective offensively OR defensively with one shift roughly every 15 minutes.
If you're not confident in Byfield, Lemieux, etc., bring in Kupari, even if just for the PK. Hell bring in a specialist like Frk. especially if the bottom six is gonna get single digit minutes, find an absolute purpose for them.