I'm not disputing the fact that Weegar is a top 20 D in the nhl. Any higher than that though is pushing it. I believe in a 50/50 approach to analytics. I mean Gryzelyck is the stud of those charts and he was a trainwreck vs the Isles in the playoffs. However, Huby is a top 20 PLAYER in the nhl. He's just better.
Yes it would suck if we lost Weegs, but in a flat cap world you have to make tough decisions. Spend too much on your D and its eventually gonna affect your forwards. Pretty soon, even Tampa's forward group isn't gonna look all that impressive. They will lose Palat, and Stammer might also decline in a couple years. I' m not saying Tampa shouldn't have locked up both Hedman and Mcd. Obviously they should have. What I'm saying is spending a lot on the D will eventually have ripple effects on the F, and vice versa. You are right that teams pay for what gives them the most bang for their buck. That's why we will sign Huby. If Weegar agrees to 6M or less, we keep him. If not, god bless him. He's been great. Yeah Bob is a boat anchir, but we have to deal with it now. He's also gone within 2 year s I predict. And eventually Knight will be making at least 7M so we won't be saving much there.