He coughed up that 1st and Timmins pretty quick when he needed too.Given how conservative Sakic has been with future assets over the years, and how reluctant he has been to move guys like Compher and Jost, I think that a lot of what's being proposed here isn't going to come true. Besides, we don't have the cap space to add multiple pieces, and before you say "But so-and-so could go the other way", that would mean moving pieces out of a team that isn't losing a lot of games right now. He isn't going to do much, if anything, to subtract from the team right now.
Watch him trade for Namestnikov and Holden this year. After all gotta get players who are familiar with the Avs organizationTo be fair he said that last year and brought in Nemeth and Soderberg...
Yes, but he's also one headshot hit away of being out for another three months. We definitely need a back up regardless.
I don't see anyone suggesting to burn "EVERYTHING" on this year, nor do I think the trades I proposed would constitute anything close to that.
The trades I proposed can be summed up as:
In:
Giroux @50%
Clutterbuck @50%
Kulak (if there's doubt about Byram's health at the deadline)
3rd
Out:
CompherThe picks are a wash and Compher and Jost can easily be replaced via free agency given their respective caphits and on-ice impacts. A 1st and Helleson would certainly hurt to lose but at some point you have to shoot your shot to try to go for a cup, and there's also no guarantee that those assets turn into impact NHL'ers if we were to keep them (see Kaut, Bowers, Bleackley, Hishon, Meloche, Morrison, Greer, etc). The trades I suggested (or something along those lines) would fill all the biggest holes and needs on the roster for this cup run, while still allowing us to keep four of our top 5 prospects going forwards (i.e. Barron, Behrens, Olausson, and Ranta). So how exactly does that constitute "burning everything on this year"?
Jost
1st
Helleson
4th
The guys on that list shouldn't be our targets, except for Giordano if he doesn't cost a 1st.
The guys Sakic should be looking at are:
De Haan
Braun
Schenn
Kulak
Colin Miller
Pysyk
In Anaheim.Where is Manson?
Definitely improves the bottom 6 and makes us tougher to play against, but that would be very lackluster (albeit realistic) and also not give us a good FO guy we desperately need.I'm not expecting Sakic to do exactly what I suggested. Giroux would be a spectacular addition but it's not very realistic given Sakic's history at the deadline.
I'd be relatively pleased if all he did was bolster the bottom 6 with a couple of savvy additions, along with a Dman if Byram isn't good to go. For example, something like Lehkonen and Clutterbuck would be a tidy deadline as far as I'm concerned. Not perfect, but tidy, and would improve both the 3rd and 4th lines along with the PK.
Landeskog -- Mackinnon -- Rantanen
Nichuskin ------ Kadri -------- Burakovsky
Lehkonen ----- Newhook --- O'Connor
Clutterbuck ----- Jost -------- Compher/NAK/Helm/MacDermid/Maltsev
Toews -- Makar
Byram -- Girard
Murray -- EJ
JJ
0% chance this happens - but the more I think about it, the more I feel like Joe should say f*** it and go for it.
1st + OO + Helleson/Barron + Jost + JTC
for
Pageau + Mayfield
We’d be giving up a lot (basically 3 firsts), but we’d be getting tough ass guys who fit all our needs, play playoff hockey and also have term. In the case of Pageau, it would also allow us to ease Hook into the 2C role over the next few years and insulate him. Again, 0% chance of this happening, but this would be a legit over the top move.
That's too much for a 3C and 4/5 Dman.0% chance this happens - but the more I think about it, the more I feel like Joe should say f*** it and go for it.
1st + OO + Helleson/Barron + Jost + JTC
for
Pageau + Mayfield
We’d be giving up a lot (basically 3 firsts), but we’d be getting tough ass guys who fit all our needs, play playoff hockey and also have term. In the case of Pageau, it would also allow us to ease Hook into the 2C role over the next few years and insulate him. Again, 0% chance of this happening, but this would be a legit over the top move.
That's too much for a 3C and 4/5 Dman.
Burakovsky's replacement next year.Beauvillier's contract is not great vs his stats, or does he bring something else to the table
I don't think it's impossible, just unrealistic that Sakic is going to make major changes under these circumstances. Unless we start playing .500 hockey from now until the deadline, I just don't see Sakic rocking the boat that much with big adds and subtracts, especially with the limited futures we have to wheel and deal with. Yes, we all want to go "all in", but Sakic does have to think about the future if he wants to convince MacK to re-sign here. After all, if we burn EVERYTHING on this year, what incentive does he have to stay on a barren club?
Imagine if Sakic had signed Andersen instead of Kuemper? Avs retain their 2022 1st, 2024 conditional 3rd and 3RD in Timmins?
I’m okay with Kuemper but the Avs would have so much more flexibility at this TDL if Andersen hadn’t gotten nervous and signed with the Canes early on. But then I’d have been nervous if we went after Andersen so there’s that.
Imagine if Sakic had signed Andersen instead of Kuemper? Avs retain their 2022 1st, 2024 conditional 3rd and 3RD in Timmins?
I’m okay with Kuemper but the Avs would have so much more flexibility at this TDL if Andersen hadn’t gotten nervous and signed with the Canes early on. But then I’d have been nervous if we went after Andersen so there’s that.