Lou just goes to show that you don’t need to be right on every move provided you build a well balanced team. It was the same thing in Toronto. He made some bad moves but on the whole he built a team that was trending as a top team.
For too many people, they rate a GM based on analyzing every bad move instead of looking at the overall scope of their work and the results on the ice. I’d only add that sometimes it’s ok to ‘lose’ a trade or signing provided it provides a key piece for your team and improves the team in the standings.
I think this is lost on a lot of fans. The objective of the GM is to win not only games, but ultimately the Stanley Cup. It's not to win trades or win free agent signings or win draft picks. At the end of the day, a GM's job is to put his team in a position to win a Cup.
Reminds me a bit of the criticisms of Rutherford being a joke. Sure, he's made some questionable moves; I've criticized a lot of them. But at the end of the day, his moves also helped the Pens win back to back Cups. That seems to be overlooked in favor of "LOL he signed Jack Johnson".
It's a main reason why I think Lou's predecessor (Snow) was a failure of a GM. He made some decent moves and hit on some of his draft picks, but ultimately his team was never a contender under him. So at the end of the day, he failed at what he was supposed to do.