2020 Jim Gregory GM of the Year winner: Lou Lamoriello

Leaf Fans

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
20,526
8,847
Wasn’t Lou Lam the Leaf’s GM responsible fir building their record setting 105 point team? The guy is an amazing GM, who builds great teams. Look at the Islanders success in Lou’s two seasons!
Was a Leaf GM. Not the Leafs GM.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
22,365
14,223
Was a Leaf GM. Not the Leafs GM.
What’s your point? Lou Lam builds teams into winners, right? He deserves this award, right? He goes to the Islanders, and loses his best player to free agency. He still builds a winner. Guy is amazing!
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
22,365
14,223
Lou Lam is a genius GM, and deserves this award. Imo, he’s done a fabulous job building a winner in just two years, especially considering his best player left (as a UFA) at the start of his tenure.
I wish my team (Vancouver) had Lou Lam.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
22,365
14,223
Of course. This thread should be on the main board. No one disputes that.
So in your opinion is Lou Lam deserving of this award? Like I said, I think he’s a genius GM, and wish we had him here in Vancouver.
 

Tres Peleches

Johnny Turncoat
Jul 13, 2011
8,427
6,785
If nothing else, between new ownership, Lou, Trotz, and the new Arena, the Isles will no longer be a laughing stock around the league
 
  • Like
Reactions: PWJunior

Islander Class

Registered User
Jun 30, 2018
332
466
South Carolina
If nothing else, between new ownership, Lou, Trotz, and the new Arena, the Isles will no longer be a laughing stock around the league

NYI done the “right” way is a franchise on par w/PHI and STL. Not “Original 6”- but that very next tier down of well-established franchises with passionate fan bases, and some great post-1970 history. The problem is NYI hadn’t been truly run the right way since about 1988 (‘93 was fun- but the foundation of the org. was already buckling). Full marks to current ownership for recognizing the special opportunity to reinvigorate a historic franchise- and committing to top mgmt.
 

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
39,155
24,048
Vancouver, BC
Lou just goes to show that you don’t need to be right on every move provided you build a well balanced team. It was the same thing in Toronto. He made some bad moves but on the whole he built a team that was trending as a top team.

For too many people, they rate a GM based on analyzing every bad move instead of looking at the overall scope of their work and the results on the ice. I’d only add that sometimes it’s ok to ‘lose’ a trade or signing provided it provides a key piece for your team and improves the team in the standings.
 

Kuznetsnow

Registered User
Nov 26, 2019
2,180
2,373
Lou just goes to show that you don’t need to be right on every move provided you build a well balanced team. It was the same thing in Toronto. He made some bad moves but on the whole he built a team that was trending as a top team.

For too many people, they rate a GM based on analyzing every bad move instead of looking at the overall scope of their work and the results on the ice. I’d only add that sometimes it’s ok to ‘lose’ a trade or signing provided it provides a key piece for your team and improves the team in the standings.

This, Capitals are great example. All the flashy moves in 2017 and they choke, lose a quarter of the team in 2018 and replace with dumpster dives and prospects, much weaker on paper, but fit together much better as a team and win the cup.

A lot of the time less is more and people don't realize it whatsoever. Good players with a chance to play up (O'Reilly, Kadri, Wilson, all of Vegas) can have much more team impact than great players playing down (Tavares, Karlsson/Burns). Penguins really being the exception
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,225
12,226
Tampere, Finland
This, Capitals are great example. All the flashy moves in 2017 and they choke, lose a quarter of the team in 2018 and replace with dumpster dives and prospects, much weaker on paper, but fit together much better as a team and win the cup.

A lot of the time less is more and people don't realize it whatsoever

Many times biggest changes are made 1-2 years before. Results will come later.
 

Kuznetsnow

Registered User
Nov 26, 2019
2,180
2,373
Many times biggest changes are made 1-2 years before. Results will come later.

Capitals had biggest change in a decade the summer they won the cup, Blues redid half their roster, Vegas was 100% new. You're not wrong but shit often has to be clicked into place
 

Kuznetsnow

Registered User
Nov 26, 2019
2,180
2,373
So Jim Benning isnt the worst GM in the NHL..?..He's in the top 10 now...?..Crazy.

Hitting on Pettersson, Hughes, Miller and Boeser will do that. And his contract work with Edler and his young players has been excellent. He also deserves credit for sticking with Markstrom, Horvat and Virtanen
 
Last edited:

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,225
12,226
Tampere, Finland
But he did that last season.

I don't think this Trophy is based on 1-season work.

Like Ken Holland can win it after three years at Edmonton, if the team will trend upwards and he doesn't make a single move on the last season of his 3-year span.

It's a reputation Trophy, given once in a year, of long-term work. Long-term work is pretty much the only way to judge General Managers.
 

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
55,860
47,081
Lou just goes to show that you don’t need to be right on every move provided you build a well balanced team. It was the same thing in Toronto. He made some bad moves but on the whole he built a team that was trending as a top team.

For too many people, they rate a GM based on analyzing every bad move instead of looking at the overall scope of their work and the results on the ice. I’d only add that sometimes it’s ok to ‘lose’ a trade or signing provided it provides a key piece for your team and improves the team in the standings.

I think this is lost on a lot of fans. The objective of the GM is to win not only games, but ultimately the Stanley Cup. It's not to win trades or win free agent signings or win draft picks. At the end of the day, a GM's job is to put his team in a position to win a Cup.

Reminds me a bit of the criticisms of Rutherford being a joke. Sure, he's made some questionable moves; I've criticized a lot of them. But at the end of the day, his moves also helped the Pens win back to back Cups. That seems to be overlooked in favor of "LOL he signed Jack Johnson".

It's a main reason why I think Lou's predecessor (Snow) was a failure of a GM. He made some decent moves and hit on some of his draft picks, but ultimately his team was never a contender under him. So at the end of the day, he failed at what he was supposed to do.
 

dlawong

Registered User
Nov 24, 2011
2,420
528
Vancouver, Canada
I think Trotz has more to do with this team’s success, but that’s just me.
But who hired him though? There is a cause and effect here.

By the way, Lou did not lose JT for the Isles. JT likely already know he is leaving even prior to the trading deadline or he would have already negotiated his deal the summer before if he is keen to stay with Isles & a big part of the reason is that former GM SNOW never got those high scoring wingers to play with him & thus the loss of interest to stay. On top of that, he got help to make up his mind from his wife, parents & sister, and maybe a couple of big marketing sponsors from Toronto.

Think about it? Who kept that Toronto Pajama picture of his? I believe with JT could not make up his mind in his final year, his mom probably showed him that picture as a reminder during one of the family get together events during the Christmas break. He is much closer to his family than one may know, which is ok as that actually shows the human part of him because most of us fans can't see his emotions during most press briefings.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad