Boothinator
@MrBoothinator
- Sep 19, 2009
- 6,259
- 3,110
STill no reason to allow 4 PPGs during that span
STill no reason to allow 4 PPGs during that span
I despise this argument so much.STill no reason to allow 4 PPGs during that span
STill no reason to allow 4 PPGs during that span
Yeah, it's easy to say they shouldn't have allowed 4 PP goals but to me what is more true is they shouldn't have been in that position to begin with. I agree with JAM, should have been a two-minute high-sticking and if they scored it would still be 3-1.I despise this argument so much.
It's the same as when people were saying "Who cares if Trocheck was tripped???? The Panthers shouldn't expect to win games 1-0!!!!!!!!!!!"
F off. The refs blew it. Call it how it is.
Yeah, it's easy to say they shouldn't have allowed 4 PP goals but to me what is more true is they shouldn't have been in that position to begin with. I agree with JAM, should have been a two-minute high-sticking and if they scored it would still be 3-1.
Momentum is a thing, and SJ had a snowball effect once they got it. Way too easy to just say Vegas should have killed it.
-ghoste
What about the Frankster? Those are his numbers.
Bob looking ****ing nice
What about the Frankster? Those are his numbers.
What about the Frankster? Those are his numbers.
The tank can flip it around if he likes, 27 is available.What about the Frankster? Those are his numbers.
Bob looking ****ing nice