That's a solid comparison. lol I've been trying to come up with a comparison for months now and you nailed it.
Caufield or Boldy or Krebs?
I personally have Hughes, Kakko, Dach, Turcotte, Byram, Zegras, and then its a crap shoot. Who would you take? I personally have Krebs, Boldy, and Newhook all up for debate.
I mean this is where scouts earn their money. Everyone knows what these guys are currently capable of but they need to project how good they will be at the next level.
For me I think scouts fall in love with a prospects potential even if the likelyhood that they reach that potential. They also look for what their organization needs rather than going BPA. I saw this with the Oilers when they wanted Oleksiak. They apparently had him high on their board because "they dont have a guy like that in the system."
Yet at the same time their are "safe" picks that dont really excel at anything. To me, this is just as bad. IMO, that's not a safe pick, those are guys you want to stay away from.
I look for guys somewhere in between. I want guys with high floors and heigh ceilings. I think some of the guys I like still have obstacles in their way but are hard working enough to overcome it.
I think each group of fans has horror stories about a certain type of player not turning out. Some guys arent fast enough while others lack IQ.
Right now I rank the them:
1. Hughes
2. Kakko
3. Byram
4. Turcotte
5. Cozens
6. Dach
7. Zegras
8. Krebs
9. Newhook
10. Boldy
11. Caufield
12. Podkolzin