J.D. Burke has apparently been back East covering the Beanpot Tourney and has high praise for Rathbone on TSN 1040....describes his skating as 'Quinn Hughes-like". Likes him better as a prospect than either Madden or McDonough.
Rathbone has had an unconventional career path, even his draft year when he headed back to high school to be close to a brother with autism. Seems like a high-character kid and a potential Harvard grad to boot. And with a shout-out to Woo and Rafferty, he might be the best d-man prospect the Canucks have right now.
Northeastern in the Beanpot Final tomorrow....is it being televised anywhere?
Rathbone better as a prospect than Madden???? That requires a username update then.........J.D. Burke has apparently been back East covering the Beanpot Tourney and has high praise for Rathbone on TSN 1040....describes his skating as 'Quinn Hughes-like". Likes him better as a prospect than either Madden or McDonough.
Rathbone has had an unconventional career path, even his draft year when he headed back to high school to be close to a brother with autism. Seems like a high-character kid and a potential Harvard grad to boot. And with a shout-out to Woo and Rafferty, he might be the best d-man prospect the Canucks have right now.
Northeastern in the Beanpot Final tomorrow....is it being televised anywhere?
Not necessarily my opinion....haven't seen either player in action, other than a few YouTube clips. But based on the fact that impact d-men are far harder to uncover than forwards, maybe Burke is basing his opinion on that.Rathbone better as a prospect than Madden???? That requires a username update then.........
Rathbone was a 4th round pick. I haven't had a chance to watch complete game footage of him either, but in shift-by-shift videos his skill, speed and lateral movement look incredible. I think he has an NHL career ahead of him.Not necessarily my opinion....haven't seen either player in action, other than a few YouTube clips. But based on the fact that impact d-men are far harder to uncover than forwards, maybe Burke is basing his opinion on that.
Canucks in a 'no-lose' position with either guy....both Madden and Rathbone trending as NHL players eventually....pretty hard to argue with that when you consider they were third and fifth round draft picks.
O I agree Jackey boy if I could like yours and @Zombotron posts I would, I think Rather is coming along just nicely and with proper patience I think we have a NHL defender hereNot necessarily my opinion....haven't seen either player in action, other than a few YouTube clips. But based on the fact that impact d-men are far harder to uncover than forwards, maybe Burke is basing his opinion on that.
Canucks in a 'no-lose' position with either guy....both Madden and Rathbone trending as NHL players eventually....pretty hard to argue with that when you consider they were third and fifth round draft picks.
A friend of mine went to see his son play at Harvard and raved about Rathbone. Considering the fact that he himself was a very good player and his son who’s playing in the NHL I trust his judgment. Rathbones going to be a very good playerRathbone was a 4th round pick. I haven't had a chance to watch complete game footage of him either, but in shift-by-shift videos his skill, speed and lateral movement look incredible. I think he has an NHL career ahead of him.
Who was thatA friend of mine went to see his son play at Harvard and raved about Rathbone. Considering the fact that he himself was a very good player and his son who’s playing in the NHL I trust his judgment. Rathbones going to be a very good player
My impression of Rathbone in the limited (5 or so) viewings I've had of him over the past couple years is that his skating/puck skills have a lot of upside but that his defensive play and positioning need *a lot* of work. Has reminded me of a forward playing defense - similar style-wise to Jordan Subban but a bit bigger and his edgework is superior.
As our better prospects go, he's probably the guy I'd be least surprised to see moved at the deadline considering how similar his position/profile is to Hughes.
Agreed. Two Hughes is WAY better than one HughesIf a team potentially had 2 Bobby Orrs in the system wouldn't it behoove them to hold onto them both and prove it and THEN trade one of them for very big things?
Wouldn't 2 Hughes(es) be a lot like that?
If a team potentially had 2 Bobby Orrs in the system wouldn't it behoove them to hold onto them both and prove it and THEN trade one of them for very big things?
Wouldn't 2 Hughes(es) be a lot like that?
Sounds like Rafferty.My impression of Rathbone in the limited (5 or so) viewings I've had of him over the past couple years is that his skating/puck skills have a lot of upside but that his defensive play and positioning need *a lot* of work. Has reminded me of a forward playing defense - similar style-wise to Jordan Subban but a bit bigger and his edgework is superior.
As our better prospects go, he's probably the guy I'd be least surprised to see moved at the deadline considering how similar his position/profile is to Hughes.
Sounds like Rafferty.
I disagree that they would move Rathbone...go back and watch that draft video, he appears to be a Weisbrod favourite. I could see Rafferty going before Rathbone.
Only one guy can get the creamy o-zone starts and top-unit PP time at a time to maximize their skillset. There are hugely diminishing returns on adding additional one-dimensional PP specialist-type defenders to a roster. Also we still have Juolevi as well, who is another version of the same thing.
Hughes is clearly a far better player/prospect than Rathbone and will be that guy. And it's unlikely Rathbone will develop into a high-value asset without getting opportunites where he can produce.
Like, I'm not saying TRADE HIM NOW. But if you're looking at moving one of our better prospects for deadline help, all things being equal it makes the most sense to trade the guy with the most redundant skillset.