Die hard Jays fan.
I can't believe you guys are still watching the games.
Really hoping for a top 3 pick next June.
Tanking for the draft is largely a pointless and unnecessary exercise in baseball. It only gets bandied about by fans because it's what everyone's used to with NHL/NBA/NFL teams and there's a natural (incorrect) assumption that it holds its viability as a strategy for baseball too. But the reality is that the exceedingly random nature of baseball drafting (far more high baseball draft picks bust and amount to absolutely nothing than other spots, and ultimate talent level/mlb success is far less tied to draft position than other sports), the incredible attrition rate of prospects, the vast size and depth of organizations in terms of churning through prospects, and the lengthy time frame for developing picks make tanking less attractive and less useful. It simply takes too long, is fraught with too much risk, and is too likely to blow up in your face to be a tenable strategy.
Real "tanking" in baseball is accomplished by collecting a lot of attractive trade chip MLBers and having a fire sale to turn them into good prospects who have already shaken off most of their risk.
Just as a for example, consider the following:
From the 2004 draft, the top 10 1st rounders (including supplemental 1sts) by cumulative career bWAR, by draft position are (underlined are the top 5 values. Italics are picks 1-3):
2, 12, 38, 11, 15, 40, 14, 23, 22, 20
From 2005:
5, 7, 11, 4, 2, 1, 23, 28, 12 42
2006:
7, 3, 11, 10, 21, 5, 6, 8, 30, 41
2007:
48 (it's Donaldson), 1, 14, 10, 34, 5, 27,
2, 54, 38
2008:
5, 3, 16, 28, 39, 46, 10, 19, 32, 29
2009:
25, 10, 17, 8, 37, 19,
2, 42, 24, 22
2010:
13, 3, 1, 23, 12, 5, 38, 7, 34, 43
2011:
8, 11, 6, 1, 14, 18, 40,
3, 44, 22
2012:
1, 18, 11, 22, 4, 19,
2,
3, 38, 41
2013:
2, 32, 34, 3, 17, 39, 13, 38, 19, 9
That's 16 players out of the 10 years of drafts who were top 3 picks and top 10 careers out of those drafts 1st rounds (16/30 total picks). So it's basically a coin flip if you're going to draft top 3 and get someone in the top 10 most valuable players from that class. If we expand the criteria to top 5 picks and focus in on getting "top 5 value", it becomes 15/50. You're actually almost as likely (12/50) to get a similarly valued player picking in the bottom third-to-half of the round.
And this doesn't even account for the fact that I'm not setting WAR thresholds, meaning that in many cases the guys getting into the top 10s listed above have had mediocre or disappointing careers. Conisder 2009, the Mike Trout draft. Those 10 players I listed above are:
Trout, Strasburg, AJ Pollock, Mike Leake, James Paxton (in his original unsigned spot with the Blue Jays), Shelby Miller, Dustin Ackley, Garret Richards, Randal Grichuk, and Kyle Gibson
That's not an entirely reassuring list, especially once you get past Trout and Strasburg. And it includes Ackley and Gibson, who are by most measures considered busts.