VladDrag
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2018
- 5,924
- 15,069
5 forward PPs are inevitable, but how do you go with a 5 forward 1st unit, but a 3F-2D second unit? Makes no sense.
I agree, but the other side is that nither we’re named Provorov
5 forward PPs are inevitable, but how do you go with a 5 forward 1st unit, but a 3F-2D second unit? Makes no sense.
Trade all our talent for their talent.if we dont get hughes, what's plan b? it seems like having talent like hughes is the only way to win a cup.
Trade all our talent for their talent.
if we dont get hughes, what's plan b? it seems like having talent like hughes is the only way to win a cup.
As we are seeing with the Nico/Nolan draft, other talent is always available.
There would’ve been grown men crying on here if we didn’t take Patrick #2. They can’t all be gems. If Patrick tops out at high end 2C, I’ll be thrilled.
Historically, we’ve been spoiled with 1st round drafting. Giroux and Richards in the 20’s is ridiculous.
Gagne was the probably the fourth or fifth best player in the 99 draft.
Elite Prospects - NHL Entry Draft 1999
And hopefully Frost will be ridiculous, too.
And hopefully Frost will be ridiculous, too.
There would’ve been grown men crying on here if we didn’t take Patrick #2. They can’t all be gems. If Patrick tops out at high end 2C, I’ll be thrilled.
Historically, we’ve been spoiled with 1st round drafting. Giroux and Richards in the 20’s is ridiculous.
The thing that will keep his points down, especially relative to other high picks in the 2017 draft, is PP time. He is going to be outscored by other players that were drafted if they are getting better opportunities to score. He isn't really playing that well (last night excluded) to warrant a lot of PP time, but once he finds a groove the PP time will be essential to reaching a certain level of points to reach that classification of 1C vs 2C. Same argument was had over Coots. I am fine with him not reaching the higher amount of points if most of the work is coming at ES and he is playing well defensively. I know you know this, just adding to the conversation.Depends on what you say high end 2C is (same thing as a 1B center?).
If I had to bet to choose Patrick becoming either a 70-80 point player vs 60-70 player, I would choose the former. Guys of his skill set seem to take three or four years to mature at the NHL level.
Gagne was the probably the fourth or fifth best player in the 99 draft.
Elite Prospects - NHL Entry Draft 1999
Explore all options for sure but I really like Podkolzin or Cozens too.
How far away are they from being NHL ready? 1-2 years? Both have good size.