Mod note: Part one here: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=2180827
Why are you bridging 1st year RFAs at 1.2?
All you have to do is look at how Larsson and Girgensons have been handled to see that's not how Murray will handle 3 first year RFAs.
You're giving them near 100% raises... it's silly
I dont see Buffalo losing Kane for nothing. If he was not signed to an extnesion, he gets traded for something likely in late July after they talk some (if he isnt traded before that)
lets relook at the trade with Winnipeg...
Bogo=Myers
so you have Kane for a UFA+ a late 1st+Armia+ Lemieux. I see Lemieux as a 4th lliner on a good team, on a poor team he plays 3rd line. Armia is a nd/3rd line winger who could play on a 1st line if there is chemistry with the linemates. The late 1st 25-30 is an utter crapshoot in terms of being anything beyond a 3rd liner/#4-6 Dman.
if Buffalo kept their players and didnt make these trades (for ROR and Kane) you would be looking at this:
vets drafted in 2012 or before (9)
Ennis, Moulson, Foligno, Gionta, Larsson,Girgensons, Grigorenko, Armia, Des,
drafted 2013 or later (9):
Eichel, Reinhart, Lemieux, Compher, Bptiste, Bailey, Fasching, Carrier, Nylander,
+ other system forwards and the 1st and 2nd round picks traded
18 forwards listed---you can only carry a max of 14 on your roster....they had too many---ideally you want to trade 2 or 3 of them and bring in an estqblished veteran forward. That is what they did.
The issue is the Ennis and Moulson contracts.....
as a result 18-19 will be close to the cap if they dont move one of them
Nylander(ELC)-Eichel ($6M)- Bailey (BR) = 8.2
Carrier (BR)-ROR($7.5M)- KO ($6M) =14.7
Kane ($6M)-Reinhart ($5M)- Baptste (BR) = 12.2
Foligno ($3M))-Larsson/Girgs ($3M)-Fasching(BR) =8.2
Moulson ($5M), Ennis ($4.6M) = 9.6
(BR)=$1.2M
(ELC)=$1M
F= 8.2+ 14.7+ 12.2+8.2+9.6=$52.9M
D/G= 11.4+ 6.7+4+5= $27.1M
T= $80M
vet ($6M)- Risto ($5.4M)
McCabe($1.6M)-Bogo($5.1M)
Guhle (ELC)- vet($2M)
vet ($1M)
Lehner ($4M)
backu ($1M)
the totl is $80M---I highly doubt the cap will be that high---more like $75M. If Buffalo could move Moulson they would be just under the cap.
This is also why I see only 1 of Foligno/Larsson/Girgensons being on the tem in 18/19. A cost cutting move. substituting $1M/ELC players saves them around $4M in cap space.
in 19/10 season
Moulson/Ennis will come off the books---that$9.6M would then go to McCabe+ Nylander or one of the other BR players.
Bogosian cap space when his contract end in 2020 would then open up space to sign Guhle from his ELC ending and save space for the likely 2017 1st Dman they would then sign after the ELC in maybe 2020 or 2021
With Toronto...in 18/19 Toronto is in a little bit of a quadry
tin 2017 and 2018 they have 10 RFA contracts up to be resigned and 7 UFAs that expire.
as of now for 18/19 thy have 7 contracts costing $29M
in 2019 they have Matthews and Marner to sign--those arent counted in the 10 RFAs I mentioned above.
If they operate with a $75M cap then you figure they would have an internal cap limit of around $60M in committed contracts in 2019 summer when they need to sign Matthews and Marner. They wil need to be careful the next couple of years and their 10 RFAs could be gotten with low offer sheets that only cost a 2nd round pick as compensation.
Also in 2019/20 them having Horton and his dead cap space will play a role that season because many of their players will be beyongd ELC so they wont be able to put contracts against Hortons LTIR.
Why are you bridging 1st year RFAs at 1.2?
All you have to do is look at how Larsson and Girgensons have been handled to see that's not how Murray will handle 3 first year RFAs.
You're giving them near 100% raises... it's silly
Last edited by a moderator:
