Random Forest
Registered User
- May 12, 2010
- 14,452
- 994
Exactly this. This should be considered a slam dunk positive move. If Filpulla were signed on July 1st, 2017 as a UFA for 1yr, 5m, everyone would be unanimous in support.The weirdest phenomenon I have came across today is:
People who wanted middle six C solidifying.
Yet don't like picking up Filppula.
When he is better than likely anyone who would be realistically there as a UFA, we got picks with him too, and he is only on a one year deal in effect when the guys in summer will ask for 3+ or not sign!
He is really a 40-45 point low end 2C at this point who does ok while matched vs 1st lines and is a solid 5v5 scorer. While also being a good PKer and solid on the dot... and can play multiple forward positions.
There's this odd perception that Filpulla was some negative value player because TB desperately needed to move him. But that speaks to TB's particular circumstance, not Filpulla.
This isn't the Umberger deal. Filpulla is a positive asset and has a functional role on this team. And he'll be gone in a year if he doesn't perform.
EDIT: Also Vorobyov really reminds me of Filpulla. Not that it matters, but I see a similar game between them.
Last edited: