Prospect Info: 2016 Ranking #5

[StayAtHomeAv]

Hey, don't speak ill of Anderson! Or Siemens. Or Geertsen, Mironov or Boikov....

Anderson is the only one who might qualify as a tree with no skills.

 

[StayAtHomeAv]

Colorado could use a draft like the one Nashville just had.

As someone who kind of roots for the Preds I was very disappointed with the Girard pick. They have numerous forwards who probably graduated to the NHL last year. I would have liked to seen a forward in the first 2 rounds due to the pool taking that hit.

 

[cgf]

Anderson is the only one who might qualify as a tree with no skills.

...Siemens?...

 

[NOTENOUGHJTCGOALS]

Hey lets draft all the D, but only the D you like, right? Not to mention all those guys aren't the same player but who needs those details.

They're tall. They're draft picks. They're all the same player.

 

[StayAtHomeAv]

...Siemens?...

Trees can't skate.

 

[Jayevs]

I wouldn't trade our first 2 picks for their first 2. Yeah I wish we took Allard in the 3rd. They had an extra 3rd too, those are nice to have. Otherwise, meh.

I know I'm saying after taking 4 high end forwards in the past couple drafts, and being so stocked with DFD prospects could you imagine adding three PMD prospects of that caliber?

 

[Freudian]

If Avs had kept Wood and Bleackley, would Siemens be a top 15 prospect for us?

 

[UncleRisto]

If Avs had kept Wood and Bleackley, would Siemens be a top 15 prospect for us?

Would Bleackley after how that went down?

Don't want to derail this, just pointing that out.

 

[tigervixxxen]

I know I'm saying after taking 4 high end forwards in the past couple drafts, and being so stocked with DFD prospects could you imagine adding three PMD prospects of that caliber?

I dont think they have much interest in drafting PMD

If Avs had kept Wood and Bleackley, would Siemens be a top 15 prospect for us?

I don't think Siemens is getting voted in that low anyway and the other two would probably still be in the top 10.

 

[PAZ]

Wood and Bleackley would both be around 8-10 on my list.

 

[ABasin]

Sorry if this is a dumb question, given it's my first time playing this prospect voting game.

Will the number of candidates for each vote grow from 6, as we get farther down the list and the answers become less obvious?

 

[tigervixxxen]

Sorry if this is a dumb question, given it's my first time playing this prospect voting game.

Will the number of candidates for each vote grow from 6, as we get farther down the list and the answers become less obvious?

Yes, definitely. We'll go up to 8 and then 10 eventually depending on how it's going.

 

[landy92mack29]

For me Wood would be 5th and Bleackley 9th

 

[CobraAcesS]

For me Wood would be 5th and Bleackley 9th

Wood over Meloche? That is at least an interesting perspective. Care to elaborate?

 

[tigervixxxen]

Landymack doesn't have Meloche 5th

 

[landy92mack29]

Wood over Meloche? That is at least an interesting perspective. Care to elaborate?

I have Meloche 4th and Wood would've been 5th

 

[cgf]

I have Meloche 4th and Wood would've been 5th

He'd be either 5th (ahead of Compher/Greer/Beaudin) or 8th (right behind that trio) for me.