SixthSens
RIP Fugu
- Dec 5, 2007
- 11,969
- 644
Isn't it a bit unusual that they would only have one team join the NHL in an expansion draft? Is there not any talk of another Western team also joining the NHL at the same time as Las Vegas? The East has 16 teams & the West has 14 teams, isn't a bit weird that they would have 15 teams? What about Seattle or Portland?
You know guys if you want an "RNH" or similar calibre player, or a "Drouin", like if you actually want one of them and aren't kicking tires then you are going to have to give up a "Chabot" or a "Ceci" or a "White+" etc., otherwise we just keep going in the same circle.. and get nothing done!! The majority of people here would never actually get a trade done and would just constantly draft players, develop them and lose them to replace them with new developing players and the cycle would never end.
You know guys if you want an "RNH" or similar calibre player, or a "Drouin", like if you actually want one of them and aren't kicking tires then you are going to have to give up a "Chabot" or a "Ceci" or a "White+" etc., otherwise we just keep going in the same circle.. and get nothing done!! The majority of people here would never actually get a trade done and would just constantly draft players, develop them and lose them to replace them with new developing players and the cycle would never end.
Teams need a pipeline moreso with a cap ,this cycle we are on is for good reason. Teams cycle through players far quicker than ever nowYou know guys if you want an "RNH" or similar calibre player, or a "Drouin", like if you actually want one of them and aren't kicking tires then you are going to have to give up a "Chabot" or a "Ceci" or a "White+" etc., otherwise we just keep going in the same circle.. and get nothing done!! The majority of people here would never actually get a trade done and would just constantly draft players, develop them and lose them to replace them with new developing players and the cycle would never end.
I like it ,but what would EK think if we traded his BFF ??To Edmonton:
- Tyson Barrie
- Curtis Lazar
- Ottawa's 3rd round pick
To Colorado:
- Marc Methot
To Ottawa:
- Edmonton's 4th overall
... then...
Ottawa signs as UFA:
- Brian Campbell ($6.75 mil, 1 yr)
Why we do this:
- There's a high chance we lose Methot to the expansion draft next year. We just get ahead of the situation by signing a 1year stopgap (upgrade) in Campbell to play top pair for 2016-17, and turn Methot + Lazar into a super high pick.
Why Edmonton does this:
- they desperately needs defence now, and in return for the 4th ovarall they get a great PMD plus a young former 1st round center plus a replacement pick
Why Colorado does this:
- they're apparently shopping/ going to lose Barrie anyways, I'm sure they'd be thrilled to replace him wih Methot.
I like it ,but what would EK think if we traded his BFF ??
We already have RNH calibre players who make half as a much money. I don't want him at all.
The team should be looking for a goalie next summer.
If we got 4rth overall for Methot, Lazar and a 3rd I'd be out celebrating right now.
Wait, sooooo Colorado is giving up Barrie and only getting Methot in return? HUH?
Colorado apparently sees Barrie as a #5 PP specialist.
We don't really, aside from Turris. If you think that then I know you haven't watched Edmonton on a regular basis over the last several seasons.
Teams that take risks on potential 1Cs usually end up doing pretty well.
This is all just fun speculation on my part that RNH could be available when I doubt he is
They can get more for him than Methot. His value is pretty high right now.
To Edmonton:
- Tyson Barrie
- Curtis Lazar
- Ottawa's 3rd round pick
To Colorado:
- Marc Methot
To Ottawa:
- Edmonton's 4th overall
... then...
Ottawa signs as UFA:
- Brian Campbell ($6.75 mil, 1 yr)
Why we do this:
- There's a high chance we lose Methot to the expansion draft next year. We just get ahead of the situation by signing a 1year stopgap (upgrade) in Campbell to play top pair for 2016-17, and turn Methot + Lazar into a super high pick.
Why Edmonton does this:
- they desperately needs defence now, and in return for the 4th ovarall they get a great PMD plus a young former 1st round center plus a replacement pick
Why Colorado does this:
- they're apparently shopping/ going to lose Barrie anyways, I'm sure they'd be thrilled to replace him wih Methot.
Colorado apparently sees Barrie as a #5 PP specialist.
Yeah, I get that I'm stretching here a bit, but I think the takeaway of my proposal is less "let's get the 4OA", and more "let's sign Campbell and trade Methot before we lose him for nothing".
Team that gets him will have to pay him top UFA salary + term, apparently he's asking for the moon. And then protect him for expansion too, so the team giving him big dollars is probably pretty thin on the blueline too.
Edmonton is likely willing to pay that. A few other teams, probably. I have no idea what this summer's UFA and trade market are going to look like with the very real possibility of an expansion draft nexr offseason hanging over everyone's head. Values might be all over the place.
We don't really, aside from Turris. If you think that then I know you haven't watched Edmonton on a regular basis over the last several seasons.
Teams that take risks on potential 1Cs usually end up doing pretty well.
This is all just fun speculation on my part that RNH could be available when I doubt he is
Do you think the Oilers would give up the 4th overall pick fir Barrie?
This is all just fun speculation on my part that RNH could be available when I doubt he is