2016 NHL re Draft

[MrThomas]

This was a very deep draft year once again. Laine already breaking records and many other players are also doing pretty good in the NHL already. Did Columbus the right move after all? Did Toronto select the wrong first overall pick? Lets find out and do the 2016 re draft!

Elite Prospects - NHL Entry Draft 2016

My top 10:

1. Laine
2. Matthews
3. McAvoy
3. Keller
4. Brett
5. Dupois
6. Tkachuc
7. Puljujarvi
8. Sergachyov
9. Borgstrom
10. Uolevi

Click to read more...

 

[rent free]

Columbus made the correct move and so did Toronto. Both teams needed C and got it.

 

[jetsforever]

Not sure if I'd have Laine over Matthews yet, although it's close
Those two and McAvoy seem to be the clear top 3 right now
Tkachuk and Keller are playing well so far, as is Sergachev

 

[dk2k]

I'm terrible at these, so I won't even attempt it. I am curious to see where others would put DeBrincat in a re-draft, though.

 

[Suntouchable13]

I may be biased but I still take Matthews 1st overall. 2 seasons is not really enough time for me to change my mind. I think that in the long run, Matthews will impact the game way more than anyone in this draft.

 

[Brobust]

So far:

1. Matthews
2. Laine
3. McAvoy
4. Keller
5. Tkachuk
6. Sergachev

Too soon to rerank anyone else from there.

 

[Frolov 6'3]

This was a very deep draft year once again. Laine already breaking records and many other players are also doing pretty good in the NHL already. Did Columbus the right move after all? Did Toronto select the wrong first overall pick? Lets find out and do the 2016 re draft!

Elite Prospects - NHL Entry Draft 2016

My top 10:

1. Laine
2. Matthews
3. McAvoy
3. Keller
4. Brett
5. Dupois
6. Tkachuc
7. Puljujarvi
8. Sergachyov
9. Borgstrom
10. Uolevi

Good to see you still found a spot for Uolevi and moves Borgstrom in your top10.

Laine over Matthews, lovely...

I have a feeling your are Finnish.

 

[Zhamnov5GoalGame]

Gasoline meet fire.

 

[93LEAFS]

If you think the Leafs are taking anyone but the franchise center considering we didn't have one you haven't been paying attention.

Gotta also love the Fin bias at the back-end.

 

[BB88]

Matthews
Laine
McAvoy
Serg
Keller
Tkatchuk.

 

[Joey Moss]

What is the point of this? There are maybe 2-3 players in this draft that you can actually say are risers and no one should be considered fallers after a rookie season.

 

[Kelly]

Matthews
Laine
McAvoy
Tkachuk
Keller
Dubois
Sergachev

What is the point of this? There are maybe 2-3 players in this draft that you can actually say are risers and no one should be considered fallers after a rookie season.

It's a Matthews vs Laine thread obv.

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

Have to think Juolevi is also Finnish enough to go ahead of Matthews

 

[93LEAFS]

What is the point of this? There are maybe 2-3 players in this draft that you can actually say are risers and no one should be considered fallers after a rookie season.

To prove the greatness of mother Finland.

 

[terrible dee]

At this point, you could re-shuffle the deck and make a good case for it.

The ONLY thing we know for sure now that time has passed is that Mathews was definitely not the BPA, and Toronto made a mistake taking him first overall.

Really good player, just not the BEST player, he's still in the top 5 though.

 

[M2Beezy]

1 Matthews
2 Mcavoy
3 Laine
4 Tkachuck
5 Keller
6 Serg
7 Dubois
8 Bratt
9 Pullji
10 Jost

 

[Suntouchable13]

At this point, you could re-shuffle the deck and make a good case for it.

The ONLY thing we know for sure now that time has passed is that Mathews was definitely not the BPA, and Toronto made a mistake taking him first overall.

Really good player, just not the BEST player, he's still in the top 5 though.

How can you say "for sure" after just 2 seasons?

 

[Kelly]

How can you say "for sure" after just 2 seasons?

You can't.

This thread will do wonders for my ignore list.

 

[Dustin]

At this point, you could re-shuffle the deck and make a good case for it.

The ONLY thing we know for sure now that time has passed is that Mathews was definitely not the BPA, and Toronto made a mistake taking him first overall.

Really good player, just not the BEST player, he's still in the top 5 though.

The ONLY thing we know for sure now that time has passed is that this a troll post.

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

Matthews
Laine
McAvoy
Tkachuk
Keller

would be my top 5

 

[96]

Matthews is so much better than Laine that it’s comical to see the Finnish, Winnipeg fans, and hfboard hipsters say otherwise.

 

[MrThomas]

1 Matthews
2 Mcavoy
3 Laine
4 Tkachuck
5 Keller
6 Serg
7 Dubois
8 Bratt
9 Pullji
10 Jost

Lol McAvoy over Laine, relly? xD

 

[MrThomas]

Matthews is so much better than Laine that it’s comical to see the Finnish, Winnipeg fans, and hfboard hipsters say otherwise.

So much better? Maybe in his first game but after that not really

 

[M2Beezy]

Lol McAvoy over Laine, relly? xD

Easily. Mcavoy will be Norris candidate within 2 seasons

 

[rent free]

At this point, you could re-shuffle the deck and make a good case for it.

The ONLY thing we know for sure now that time has passed is that Mathews was definitely not the BPA, and Toronto made a mistake taking him first overall.

Really good player, just not the BEST player, he's still in the top 5 though.

i think toronto shoulda took juolevi. sucks vancity has him. would kill to get him. who needs a franchise C anyways...