How do people voting for Brooks feel confident enough that he's our next best prospect, when two players (Woll and Greenway) were selected a round before him by PROFESSIONALS just 4 weeks ago.
I'm not trying to sound condescending or anything... genuinely curious.
Each play a separate position, for one. I've never valued goalies highly myself, simply because there's not a lot of floor. A forward with top 6 upside can still turn into a reliable bottom 6er. Goalies don't have that option. Either they end up being a solid starter or bust (backups are a dime-a-dozen). I like Woll's upside. He looks as solid of a goalie prospect as any but his position puts him lower on my depth chart than perhaps most others. As well, goalies in the draft are a bit different. Once one goes, they all tend to go in short-order. Not saying this was necessarily the case, but picking a defenseman like Greenway could also have been a positional decision, given our need for defenseman. At that stage, there's not a lot of difference between #72 and #92 (Brooks) anyway.
Hunter and co. may be looking for different attributes in different picks, for another. Guys like Greenway and Woll may have solid upside but are, at minimum, 3-4 years of college away from going pro and in all likelihood 5-6 before making a jump to the NHL. Someone like Brooks, meanwhile, is going to be in the AHL next year and is coming off a 120-pt. WHL season. NHL-readiness is taken into account here whereas for Hunter and co. it probably wouldn't come into consideration.
So this is Brooks for me. I have Gauthier around 25, so a little early for him yet IMO.