An engineering college near Boston. The interview was in 2004.
The process involved cutting the applicant pool down to 2x the number of eventual students based on the usual GPA/scores/essays/recommendations, and then bringing them all to the college over two weekends before the second and final cut. Part of that weekend was individual and group interviews.
Groups of 6 were given a topic that they would debate 3-against-3 after some time to prepare. Our topic was on objectionable mascots, specifically racist mascots in sports. One girl in my group's father was apparently involved in a fight to keep the Fighting Illini as the University of Illinois's mascot, so she was very pro that side. I was on the other side. Once the debate started, it quickly became about University of Illinois specifically, since she was filled with really absurd rhetoric that she'd obviously gotten from her father and it was super easy to debate against. She was way too emotionally involved, and actually broke down crying during the debate because it wasn't going her way.
My individual interview was right after, and a lot of it was a discussion about ways to interact with people that are obviously wrong but that I may have to work with again in the future. I have no idea if the girl was offered admission, but she wasn't in my freshman class.
38-10 Seattle.
Redskins defense can never handle dual-threat QBs or anyone for that matter.
which seems strange since they have one and should know how to scheme against it
We definitely need some polls that ask a lot more redskins for their thoughts on the name. 400 redskins might not be a meaningful sample.
Assuming the 400 are selected mostly randomly, ie not self-selected or all selected out of some sub-group (such as landline owners, like the other poll cited in this thread), 400 is plenty big to represent a population of 5 million. It gives a confidence interval of around ±4.6%
95% sure that the actual percentage of those 5.2 million Native Americans against the name is between 62.4% and 71.6%, in the case of that study
See for yourself here: http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm
Seattle is way worse on the road. 'Skins make a game of it for a while.
27-17 Seattle
This will be like the Chargers Jets game yesterday. It'll be over in the first series.
I will bet you my house that Cousins has more than 27 yards passing. I'll bet you my car we have more than 60 yards passing as a team. The NYJ set football back 50 years with that performance yesterday.
Cousins completed passes to more New York Giants than he did Washington wide receivers last week. What do you think the Seahawks D is going to do to him?
It's going to be ugly.
Is that actually true about the more passes to NYG or are you exaggerating for effect? Neither would surprise me.
I'm talking targets. 4 different Giants, 3 different WRs.