jimslob
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2008
- 549
- 65
^ Max Domi
Of course I don't know why I said Drouin. I had already forgot about Domi's dominant WJC.
^ Max Domi
nichushkin is considerably bigger than virtanen
Size means nothing if you do not use it, ask Taylor Pyatt.
This thread was awful to read through the past two years, glad everytime Nuke gets a secondary assist posters this isn't being bumped
Interesting comparison if you consider their time in similar minutes. Horvat has spent most of the year on the 4th line with Dorsett. In those minutes here's his production and the offense the team generates with those two on the ice:
Pts/60: 1.63
GF/60: 2.45
Pretty respectable pace, though granted it's a smaller sample. Still, when you compare that to what Nichushkin did last year in the 500 minutes he didn't play with Benn, the contrast is stark:
Pts/60: 0.64
GF/60: 0.765
Nichushkin has yet to demonstrate that he can do anything at the NHL level without being hitched to two superstars in Benn and Seguin. Doesn't mean he won't be a great player, but he hasn't shown it yet.
And just to illustrate how awful those numbers are, here are Tom Sestito's numbers from last year:
Pts/60: 0.98
GF/60: 1.35
Interesting comparison if you consider their time in similar minutes. Horvat has spent most of the year on the 4th line with Dorsett. In those minutes here's his production and the offense the team generates with those two on the ice:
Pts/60: 1.63
GF/60: 2.45
Pretty respectable pace, though granted it's a smaller sample. Still, when you compare that to what Nichushkin did last year in the 500 minutes he didn't play with Benn, the contrast is stark:
Pts/60: 0.64
GF/60: 0.765
Nichushkin has yet to demonstrate that he can do anything at the NHL level without being hitched to two superstars in Benn and Seguin. Doesn't mean he won't be a great player, but he hasn't shown it yet.
And just to illustrate how awful those numbers are, here are Tom Sestito's numbers from last year:
Pts/60: 0.98
GF/60: 1.35
Interesting. Their CF% is
Nich - 50.7%
Horvat - 42.2%
Dallas was 14th last year as a team, Vancouver currently sits 20th.
Very different players but I can see a case made for either.
You have to realize there's a vast difference in their quality of teammates.
Interesting comparison if you consider their time in similar minutes. Horvat has spent most of the year on the 4th line with Dorsett. In those minutes here's his production and the offense the team generates with those two on the ice:
Pts/60: 1.63
GF/60: 2.45
Pretty respectable pace, though granted it's a smaller sample. Still, when you compare that to what Nichushkin did last year in the 500 minutes he didn't play with Benn, the contrast is stark:
When away from Seguin and Benn, Nich's CF% was still about 6% higher. Possession wise, Horvat doesn't look ready. Nich was already playing in the KHL against men. Far more prepared early on.
That said, it looks like Horvat now has acclimatized to his new environment. Getting used to the pro game. I expect his possession numbers to be better from here on out. That 4th line is looking strong game to game. Only a matter of time.
When away from Seguin and Benn, Nich's CF% was still about 6% higher. Possession wise, Horvat doesn't look ready. Nich was already playing in the KHL against men. Far more prepared early on.
That said, it looks like Horvat now has acclimatized to his new environment. Getting used to the pro game. I expect his possession numbers to be better from here on out. That 4th line is looking strong game to game. Only a matter of time.
Question, are his possession number based on his whole line. So if Dorset has the puck and loses it and the line doesn't regain possession again that shift that's a hit against Horvat?
I ask because from watching him play when he has the puck on his stick he protects it very well, rarely being striped and makes smart passes to open team mates.
^i can't wait until there are similar numbers showing Virtanen was a better pick than Ehlers and Nylander
52% on the faceoffs as a rookie. That is almost unheard of. In comparison, Malhotra's faceoff percentage was like 44%. Kesler's was 46.8% in his first full season as a Canuck. Horvat is going to be a very valuable player moving forward. I am pretty happy with this pick.
In Horvat's prime, his faceoff percentage is going to be sitting at 60-65% consistently. The guy is solid on the dot and a defensive tank.
My biggest argument against drafting nishkinihkinuskhn was the bolting to the KHL factor. Now that the KHL seems to be in financial hell that seem less of a threat.
Gillis couldn't have predicted that though.
i would still take horvat.