MS
1%er
We've heard this same 'weak draft' stuff for every draft since 2000 except for 2003. It seems like 2003 is used as a basis for comparison, and every draft fails to stack up.
To me, this draft looks about as average as it gets. Probably weaker in the top-10 than last year, but stronger in the 15-25 range.
2002 and 2004 were weak drafts ... this draft is substantially better than those years.
To me, this draft looks about as average as it gets. Probably weaker in the top-10 than last year, but stronger in the 15-25 range.
2002 and 2004 were weak drafts ... this draft is substantially better than those years.