JasonMacIsaac said:
What a joke, Olesz, Tukonen, Radulov have no right being in the top 10. I guess people on here forget last year was a draft class for the ages. I would take Carter over Tukonen any day of the week and Ruchards/Parise over Radulov also.
Well two things, this is what happens when you may a post late at night...I put Fleury in the top 10 forwards lol..... I also put Evgeni Michalek lol.
Hey lighten up..... He was asking us to compare the top 10 to next years top 10..... Parise, Carter, Richards, Stewart,Getzlaf....guys I like more then most of the top 10 in 2004, could not be added because they were not selected in the top 10.
I agree totally, Except I think Tukonen could be better then Carter.
2003 was AMAZING...but I was simply comparing top 10 to top 10.
Thats why I didnt make a top 10 for defensman, or else guys like Brent Seabrooke, ect. wouldve made the list.
I agree with Jason that 2003 is still a underated draft.... But strictly looking at the players the top 10 of 2003 to the top 10 projected players in 2004....it's closer then you think.
Alexander Ladd....I cant believe I forgot about him....
I'm going to delete that post because It's a horrible one, My rankings would not be that.... DONT POST WHEN YOUR TIRED FOLKS!