2003 vs 2004

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Chuckalinsky, May 15, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Chuckalinsky

    Chuckalinsky Registered User

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How would you rank the top five prospects from the 2003 draft compared with the top five potential prospects from 2004. I know some aren't technically "prospects" anymore, but where would you put them ranked 1 to 10 on talent and potential.
     
  2. Epsilon

    Epsilon #basta

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    48,464
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    South Cackalacky
    My Top 5 for 2004 will be: Ovechkin, Malkin, Olesz, Barker, and Tukonen.

    I'm not going to change the Top 5 from 2003, it is: Fleury, Staal, Horton, Zherdev, and Vanek.

    Here's the "Top 10"

    1. Ovechkin
    2. Malkin
    3. Fleury
    4. Zherdev
    5. Staal
    6. Horton
    7. Vanek
    8. Olesz
    9. Barker
    10. Tukonen
     
  3. pittengineer

    pittengineer Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    PhD Student
    Thats pretty much how I see it also.
     
  4. Epsilon

    Epsilon #basta

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    48,464
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    South Cackalacky
    It should be noted that if I could go deeper into the 2003 draft than 5 players there would be more 2003 guys in there (Michalek, Suter, etc.). If I was going to do a "Total Top 10" it would have Ovechkin and Malkin, then 8 players from 2003 most likely. Maybe Olesz squeaks on.
     
  5. IFK

    IFK Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    My TOP10 forwards (potential):

    1. Ovechkin
    2. Malkin
    3. Tukonen
    4. Staal
    5. Zherdev
    6. Radulov
    7. Olesz
    8. Horton
    9. Vanek
    10. Michalek
     
  6. Letang fan 58

    Letang fan 58 No More Fleury

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    5,814
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    My top 10 players over the last 2 years:

    1 Ovechkin
    2 Malkin
    3 Fleury
    4 Zherdev
    5 Phaneuf
    6 Stall
    7 Vanek
    8 Coburn
    9 Barker
    10 Vanek
     
  7. Luigi Lemieux

    Luigi Lemieux Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    17,716
    Likes Received:
    1,880
    Trophy Points:
    231
    :teach:
     
  8. sparkplug

    sparkplug Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    ^
    Well, the goal starved penguins are going to start needing goal production from EVERYONE :)
     
  9. Jason MacIsaac

    Jason MacIsaac Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,155
    Likes Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    NWO RCN
    Location:
    Halifax, NS
    What a joke, Olesz, Tukonen, Radulov have no right being in the top 10. I guess people on here forget last year was a draft class for the ages. I would take Carter over Tukonen any day of the week and Ruchards/Parise over Radulov also.
     
  10. sparkplug

    sparkplug Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    Agreed, I guess people tend to take the 2003 draft class for granted sometimes. However, the thing with prospects is that it's such an open ended thing that sometimes, you can't really call anybody WRONG.
     
  11. Michalek#9

    Michalek#9 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Saskatoon, Canada
    Home Page:
    Reminding you its Evgeni Malkin not Michalek but I cant blame you from putting Michalek, hes always on your mind haha.
     
  12. IFK

    IFK Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    That is your opinion. Last year draft is very deep, but it not means that they have all better top end potential. If you are never seen Tukonens play then i understand that you cant agree with me. I understand that you Canadians are proud whith last year draft because its your draft but believe me, Tukonen is real deal. He is so underrated. About 2 years ago he was ranked 3rd in world, but then he are come down. No people are finally seeing his potential and i think that is future "francise" player. Tukonens star is finally start rising.
     
  13. Hiishawk

    Hiishawk Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,225
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Out there somewhere
    Home Page:
    Unfortunately for you, the consensus among hockey people is that 2003 was a draft of quality DEPTH, NOT that the top 5 or 6 in 2003 was so much better than any other year. Last year's top 5 and this years' are pretty even in my book (and many others).

    Top 20 is another matter.
     
  14. X-SHARKIE

    X-SHARKIE Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,362
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Janesville Wisconsin
    Home Page:
    Well two things, this is what happens when you may a post late at night...I put Fleury in the top 10 forwards lol..... I also put Evgeni Michalek lol.

    Hey lighten up..... He was asking us to compare the top 10 to next years top 10..... Parise, Carter, Richards, Stewart,Getzlaf....guys I like more then most of the top 10 in 2004, could not be added because they were not selected in the top 10.

    I agree totally, Except I think Tukonen could be better then Carter.

    2003 was AMAZING...but I was simply comparing top 10 to top 10.

    Thats why I didnt make a top 10 for defensman, or else guys like Brent Seabrooke, ect. wouldve made the list.

    I agree with Jason that 2003 is still a underated draft.... But strictly looking at the players the top 10 of 2003 to the top 10 projected players in 2004....it's closer then you think.

    Alexander Ladd....I cant believe I forgot about him....

    I'm going to delete that post because It's a horrible one, My rankings would not be that.... DONT POST WHEN YOUR TIRED FOLKS!
     
  15. Rahan

    Rahan Registered User

    Joined:
    May 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,760
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Chicoutimi
    Home Page:
    Still tired?
     
  16. X-SHARKIE

    X-SHARKIE Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,362
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Janesville Wisconsin
    Home Page:
    lol..... Andrew Lad....ANDREW.....EVGENI EVGENI MALKIN.

    I just wont post on this thred again lol.
     
  17. Divine Wind

    Divine Wind Guest

    That looks pretty bang on to me. The 1st 3 have "superstar" potential, all the rest have "star" potential.
     
  18. Chuckalinsky

    Chuckalinsky Registered User

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    X-Sharkie - so what was your top ten then. I never did see it even if you were tired or not. Including all prospects from 04 and 03 if you like. I was more wondering about the high end talent...more than the "depth." For instance would you have Olesz rated above Vanek, Staal etc? I thought the top four this year would have gone first overall last year. Is this valid? Make sure you get a few hours of sleep before you post though...lol.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"