scottywiper
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2018
- 8,513
- 4,490
I'm guessing that BT has been trying to bank wins to try and give the Isles a bit of a cushion before letting Sorokin carry more of the load but I agree, Varly won't hold up and Sorokin can't improve the way starts are being distributed now. Let's hope we get a good showing from Moby this afternoon and then perhaps BT will feel comfortable being in more of a 2 or 3 starts to 1 rather than a 4 to 1 rhythm.Last year Boston owned us, this year we own them. Last year we owned Pittsburgh, this year they own us.
I’m kinda baffled by some Trotz roster moves this year, may have cost at least 3-4 losses. Don’t understand sitting Sorokin 1 1/2 weeks after he gets a shutout, now you expect him to come in sharp after all that time off ? Bizarre. Obviously Varlamov played like he was fatigued. At age 33, Varlamov should be getting 2 starts to every 1 for Sorokin, not 4 to every 1. Can’t keep both goalies sharp by giving a guy 4 starts out of 20. And starting the other guy 16 out of 20.
Are we talking about the same Butch Goring?
His hotel room broken into while he was playing and his wardrobe wasn't stolen. When he coached in the 90s it was earth-tones. He's infamous for his bad fashion. I suspect his second wife has whipped him into shape as she's a producer with MSG.
We're trying to bank points NOW, not ease in a rookie goaltender.Last year Boston owned us, this year we own them. Last year we owned Pittsburgh, this year they own us.
I’m kinda baffled by some Trotz roster moves this year, may have cost at least 3-4 losses. Don’t understand sitting Sorokin 1 1/2 weeks after he gets a shutout, now you expect him to come in sharp after all that time off ? Bizarre. Obviously Varlamov played like he was fatigued. At age 33, Varlamov should be getting 2 starts to every 1 for Sorokin, not 4 to every 1. Can’t keep both goalies sharp by giving a guy 4 starts out of 20. And starting the other guy 16 out of 20.
He was, but I think he got rattled by the Crosby goal where he lost his edge. After that he didn't seem quite right the rest of the way.Varly was compromised the first 2 goals. As others have stated, including me, he played well enough to win.
For whatever reason, they are reversing their outcome the past two seasons; they play scared, hesitant against the Pens this year.
We're trying to bank points NOW, not ease in a rookie goaltender.
Entering this game Semyon Varlamov was 9-4 with a 2.06 GA, .928 sv% and 3 shutouts. You would sit him more often because Sorokin got his 1st shutout in his 1st win???
Until last night Varlamov was showing no signs he was being overworked. Maybe now there is a sign.The reason given by the poster was that Varlamov may be now getting overworked and Sorokin not enough reps to develop consistency. Not an outlandish take. Islanders generally have done better in rolling two goalies consistently.
Personally, I have no problem with Trotz riding Varlamov. But for me last night was the first game that Varlamov looked off... possibly due to overwork. Hopefully, going forward using Sorokin more becomes a viable option... it would be for the betterment of both players and team now. It’s also the organization’s long-term development plan.
I wouldn't expect Varly to show signs of overwork at this point in the season, and who knows what the reasons for last night's hiccups were. What matters is that we don't want him to get to a point of overworked, or hurt, because all we have at this point is a very inexperienced backup who still needs reps to be ready for those eventualities should they occur.Until last night Varlamov was showing no signs he was being overworked. Maybe now there is a sign.
Until last night Varlamov was showing no signs he was being overworked. Maybe now there is a sign.
I wouldn't expect Varly to show signs of overwork at this point in the season, and who knows what the reasons for last night's hiccups were. What matters is that we don't want him to get to a point of overworked, or hurt, because all we have at this point is a very inexperienced backup who still needs reps to be ready for those eventualities should they occur.
I'm not going to overthink it. Any time you make a mistake like Varly did last night a (when he tripped unmolested leading to Sid's goal), you're probably going to be off the whole night. It's like in any profession. I used to have to do a fair amount of public speaking and was generally pretty good at it, but on those occasions when I did stumble or lose my train of thought or whatever, particularly if it happened at or near the beginning, I often found it tough to rally back to full composure. I'd get through it, but would never feel right. I suspect that is what was at play last night.Agree with the bolded.
Also, I wouldn’t even say yesterday was so much physical (although I feel like he has taken some hard run-ins recently). I’m just wondering if it becomes a bit of mental overwork?
I don’t know how to describe it. But the analogy I always think of is that Varlamov is like an antenna radio. Working just fine then just loses clear reception. He’s had episodes where his game just turns south for some games.
For example, had a great playoffs and equally bad second half of the Philadelphia series. Maybe it’s a Pennsylvania hockey team thing with him?
I'm not going to overthink it. Any time you make a mistake like Varly did last night a (when he tripped unmolested leading to Sid's goal), you're probably going to be off the whole night. It's like in any profession. I used to have to do a fair amount of public speaking and was generally pretty good at it, but on those occasions when I did stumble or lose my train of thought or whatever, particularly if it happened at or near the beginning, I often found it tough to rally back to full composure. I'd get through it, but would never feel right. I suspect that is what was at play last night.