GDT: 141030 - Sharks @ Wild 5pm CSNCA

[hockeyball]

While the reffing was a joke, this team is horrific after the first and that is a recipe for failure. This team cannot hold a lead, at all.

 

[do0glas]

We got pretty out worked so I'll take the point.

After Saturday they get four days off I think.

 

[hohosaregood]

I blame fatigue.

 

[stator]

What was the review on Burn's goal for?

Goalie interference is not subject to video review. Or, did they change the rules to add this?

 

[The McMafia]

I blame fatigue.

Schedule hasn't done them any favors but you still need to come out with two points. That said, things are looking up compared to a week ago.

 

[YoungSinatra]

Am I the only one in the boat in thinking neither of our waived goals should've counted?

 

[Negatively Positive]

Minnesota is a good team so I'll take the point. They need to give a better effort and empty their tanks against the Isles since they have 4 days off after that.

 

[Quid Pro Clowe]

What was the review on Burn's goal for?

Goalie interference is not subject to video review. Or, did they change the rules to add this?

Toronto told them they were wrong but the call has to stand under rule titled stupidity.

My opinion, anyway.

 

[alexander supertramp]

Am I the only one in the boat in thinking neither of our waived goals should've counted?

yep. hope you can swim

 

[Quid Pro Clowe]

Am I the only one in the boat in thinking neither of our waived goals should've counted?

Yes.

The slight contact on Kuemper on Demers' goal was well prior to the goal itself. Kuemper had a chance to get over and wasn't quick enough.

Hate the way games are being called.

 

[Gene Parmesan]

While the reffing was a joke, this team is horrific after the first and that is a recipe for failure. This team cannot hold a lead, at all.

8th game in 13 days against one of the best teams in the west. Chill.

 

[Gene Parmesan]

Minnesota is a good team so I'll take the point. They need to give a better effort and empty their tanks against the Isles since they have 4 days off after that.

They played hard. They need to bear down and win some faceoffs.

 

[Coily]

Am I the only one in the boat in thinking neither of our waived goals should've counted?

When it happens against us for a goal. You'll change your mind.

Just like last year when they would allow it against us, then waive it off when we do it.

 

[Gene Parmesan]

Those goals should have counted. 2nd year in a row they have been boned on those calls by Toronto.

 

[hockeyball]

8th game in 13 days against one of the best teams in the west. Chill.

Sure, except they fave one if the worst second and third period differentials in the league, but ya I'm sure it's no big deal...

 

[YoungSinatra]

When it happens against us for a goal. You'll change your mind.

Just like last year when they would allow it against us, then waive it off when we do it.

Yeah, that's true.. and I'm sure it'll happen I was looking at it in the mindset of if Niemi got hit that slightly and gave the goal we'd be crying the same river so I'm fine with it being waived off.

 

[hohosaregood]

I dunno, I'm not too worried about it if the last couple games are what they can do at their best. They're not getting a lot of practice time either. It's probably hard to work out the kinks in the game plan.

 

[Gene Parmesan]

I dunno, I'm not too worried about it if the last couple games are what they can do at their best. They're not getting a lot of practice time either. It's probably hard to work out the kinks in the game plan.

Yup. Not worried. Just frustrated to watch goals come off the board when they should have counted.

 

[Gene Parmesan]

Sure, except they fave one if the worst second and third period differentials in the league, but ya I'm sure it's no big deal...

Yeah lets panic. It can't be improved! Not this early!

 

[alexander supertramp]

Here is the official explanation:

At 3:50 of overtime in the San Jose Sharks/Minnesota Wild game, the Situation Room initiated a video review because the puck entered the Minnesota net. The referee informed the Situation Room that San Jose's Brent Burns made incidental contact in the crease with Minnesota goaltender Darcy Kuemper before the puck crossed the Wild goal line. This is not a reviewable play therefore the referee's call on the ice stands - no penalty and no goal San Jose.

so we can redirect our venom at the on ice referee, not Toronto!

 

[Alwalys]

Here is the official explanation:

At 3:50 of overtime in the San Jose Sharks/Minnesota Wild game, the Situation Room initiated a video review because the puck entered the Minnesota net. The referee informed the Situation Room that San Jose's Brent Burns made incidental contact in the crease with Minnesota goaltender Darcy Kuemper before the puck crossed the Wild goal line. This is not a reviewable play therefore the referee's call on the ice stands - no penalty and no goal San Jose.

so we can redirect our venom at the on ice referee, not Toronto!

yeah the ref blew it, clearly burns' contact had nothing to do with the puck going in.

 

[Gene Parmesan]

Here is the official explanation:

At 3:50 of overtime in the San Jose Sharks/Minnesota Wild game, the Situation Room initiated a video review because the puck entered the Minnesota net. The referee informed the Situation Room that San Jose's Brent Burns made incidental contact in the crease with Minnesota goaltender Darcy Kuemper before the puck crossed the Wild goal line. This is not a reviewable play therefore the referee's call on the ice stands - no penalty and no goal San Jose.

so we can redirect our venom at the on ice referee, not Toronto!

It clearly crossed the line before he hit the goalie. Whatever.

 

[hockeyball]

Yeah lets panic. It can't be improved! Not this early!

Not panicking, just not optimistic, nothing has changed

 

[fasterthanlight]

I'm so tired of things not being review-able. What's the logic? Is there any? It seems like that type of rule is simply an artifact from when videos weren't 4K HD and technology wasn't as good.

 

[WTFetus]

Am I the only one in the boat in thinking neither of our waived goals should've counted?

Missed the first waived off goal, but I was fine with the explanation for disallowing Burns'. What a power move by Burns though.