Beerz
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2011
- 35,737
- 11,551
GDT: #11 – Bruins at Sabres – Thu Oct 30, 7:00PM ET – MSG-B, BELL TV – WGR
- Thread starter Woodhouse
- Start date
He's still on. Not a lot "interesting". Not a lot that isn't just general rhetoric.
Only possibly meaty question so far went to Nolan's status, with host essentially saying Nolan's biggest attribute/thing going for him is his ability to motivate work ethic, etc., and asked Murray how Nolan is doing in that regard (seeing how 30% of the games were "lost badly"). Murray's response was hedging, general, talked about everyone having to improve from coaches to players, said he knew it would take time for Nolan to get thru, etc.
Zads is avail to play, not up to him to tell coaches who to play though.
Murray claims would pref a big truck over a SC ring.
But of course wants name on cup more than the truck ;-)
But of course wants name on cup more than the truck ;-)
SundherDome
Y'all have to much power
@BuffaloSabres
#Sabres lineup this evening:
26-63-21
17-28-12
80-8-82
19-23-44
4-57
61-55
6-24
1
#BOSvsBUF
#Sabres lineup this evening:
26-63-21
17-28-12
80-8-82
19-23-44
4-57
61-55
6-24
1
#BOSvsBUF
Stafford: Yeah for sure it's embarrassing to only have 10, 11 goals, whatever it is.
Seriously, he doesn't know how many goals the team has? And Nolan has really reached these guys eh? They understand how bad it is and they really, really care... They care so much about how their own team is doing that one of the so-called "top 6" isn't quite certain how many goals they've somehow managed to "rack' up.
Seriously, he doesn't know how many goals the team has? And Nolan has really reached these guys eh? They understand how bad it is and they really, really care... They care so much about how their own team is doing that one of the so-called "top 6" isn't quite certain how many goals they've somehow managed to "rack' up.
Beerz
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2011
- 35,737
- 11,551
Stafford: Yeah for sure it's embarrassing to only have 10, 11 goals, whatever it is.
Seriously, he doesn't know how many goals the team has? And Nolan has really reached these guys eh? They understand how bad it is and they really, really care... They care so much about how their own team is doing that one of the so-called "top 6" isn't quite certain how many goals they've somehow managed to "rack' up.
I don't find it important to know.
Side Stache
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2011
- 237
- 2
Ohh, I wanna sleep so badly.. But got a feeling this will be a game where we score more than 3.
Coffee time.
Hah, be happy it's 1 hour earlier than usually.
Paxon
202* Stanley Cup Champions
Stafford: Yeah for sure it's embarrassing to only have 10, 11 goals, whatever it is.
Seriously, he doesn't know how many goals the team has? And Nolan has really reached these guys eh? They understand how bad it is and they really, really care... They care so much about how their own team is doing that one of the so-called "top 6" isn't quite certain how many goals they've somehow managed to "rack' up.
Thought this was sarcasm until I finished it. You expect players to know the team goal totals? Wat. He's actually right (11) and you're still criticizing him?
We are different people.
In my world if someone truly "cares" about their situation, they know the details. I've never met a diligent student who wasn't acutely aware of their GPA 24/7, or a responsible adult asking for economic help who didn't know precisely what they had, precisely what they needed, and the difference between the two.
And anyway, we're talking a pathetic 10 goals for the entire team, aka: the reason for much of the criticism. Then there's Stafford, an apparent leader and veteran of the team, in a contract year, 12% into a contract year, with 0 goals and 4 points...
Yeah, he ought to know how FEW goals the team has scored collectively, and maybe not sound quite so flippant when talking about it being "10, 11 or whatever it is".
http://www.nhl.com/ice/teamstats.htm?season=20142015&gameType=2&viewName=goalsFor#
Pretty sure that says 10 goals?
And yes, I kinda expect that a team this far into the season with only 10 goals collectively has a full roster of players acutely aware of their scoring difficulties...
But hey, that's just me.
Beerz
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2011
- 35,737
- 11,551
"10, 11 or whatever it is" Translation ...: 10 or 11 it doesn't matter. Neither is acceptable.
moomoosoup
Registered User
- Oct 8, 2014
- 929
- 0
Stafford: Yeah for sure it's embarrassing to only have 10, 11 goals, whatever it is.
Seriously, he doesn't know how many goals the team has? And Nolan has really reached these guys eh? They understand how bad it is and they really, really care... They care so much about how their own team is doing that one of the so-called "top 6" isn't quite certain how many goals they've somehow managed to "rack' up.
If the players were stat watching, I'd be concerned as to why they're not more focused on improving. Knowing exactly how many goals your team has isn't going to make you a better player.
Paxon
202* Stanley Cup Champions
http://www.nhl.com/ice/standings.htm?season=20142015&sort=standingsGoalsFor&type=CON
Officially they have 11 goals for, because of the shootout winner. So, "10 or 11" is the most correct answer one can give it turns out.
misterchainsaw
Preparing PHASE TWO!
The funny thing is either could be right depending on how you count them. 11 counting the team goal awarded for a shootout win (which is what shows up in the standings), 10 if you take it out.
E: Bah, Rob beat me to it.
