Proposal: #1 overall to NYR

Anthony5967

Registered User
Dec 24, 2015
7,745
5,439
Strong Island, NY
There is a lot of hype around Fox because he is that good. He has an amazing ability to see the right pass and if its not there, buying time until it is. It's something that isn't easily taught and few possess this skill.
Now, if we are talking hype, take a gander at Quinn Hughes. He may live up to the hype, but it is a bit premature.
He's Zubov 2.0.
 

Anthony5967

Registered User
Dec 24, 2015
7,745
5,439
Strong Island, NY
There have only been a handful of #1 dmen in the NHL’s 103 year history?????

HAAAAH! HAHAHAHAHA!!

tenor.gif
Yet he's the guy telling another poster that he just wasted a wall of text. His Ranger hate doesn't allow him to be unbiased. I mean, sure, you can say the same for the ones arguing he has as much upside as a Hughes, but, like watch the games, man. I'm not going to sit here and attempt to be an expert on Butcher, Mueller, etc, because I do not watch them enough. It's clear you ran with the narrative on Fox that he's a PP specialist, isn't fast, "weak defensively", etc. Hughes and Makar are two guys everybody drools over, which is why the narrative on both is they're already elite. Nobody says a negative thing about either.
 

Pitaya

Prince of the Alps, Nico Hischier
Dec 14, 2019
2,708
1,825
Are you just looking for attention or are you really that dense?
Yes, the one saying lets wait for Fox to play more than 70 games before he’s proclaimed as an automatic future top pair defenseman is ‘dense’

We get it - the Rags havent had much to root for defensively in the last decade besides McDonagh and theyre looking for someone to fill the void they thought Trouba would (he will be better next year though)

But sure, a 46 point defenseman who got beat regularly in the first half is a soon to be top pair guy lol.
 
Feb 27, 2002
37,903
7,976
NYC
Yes, the one saying lets wait for Fox to play more than 70 games before he’s proclaimed as an automatic future top pair defenseman is ‘dense’

We get it - the Rags havent had much to root for defensively in the last decade besides McDonagh and theyre looking for someone to fill the void they thought Trouba would (he will be better next year though)

But sure, a 46 point defenseman who got beat regularly in the first half is a soon to be top pair guy lol.
Guess I got my answer.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
33,710
30,016
Yes, the one saying lets wait for Fox to play more than 70 games before he’s proclaimed as an automatic future top pair defenseman is ‘dense’

We get it - the Rags havent had much to root for defensively in the last decade besides McDonagh and theyre looking for someone to fill the void they thought Trouba would (he will be better next year though)

But sure, a 46 point defenseman who got beat regularly in the first half is a soon to be top pair guy lol.

Fox had some of the best defensive numbers in the league, what are you talking about?

You know it's okay to recognize talented players, even when they play for a rival. I hate the Rangers as much as anyone but Fox is legit.
 

Pitaya

Prince of the Alps, Nico Hischier
Dec 14, 2019
2,708
1,825
Fox had some of the best defensive numbers in the league, what are you talking about?

You know it's okay to recognize talented players, even when they play for a rival. I hate the Rangers as much as anyone but Fox is legit.
In the first half Fox was not as good defensively, and he regularly got beat on the rush. then the second half he played like a rock and Im not taking that away from him

Once again lets wait until he plays an entire season at that defensive level before we go crowning him as a soon to be top pair guy.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
33,710
30,016
In the first half Fox was not as good defensively, and he regularly got beat on the rush. then the second half he played like a rock and Im not taking that away from him

Once again lets wait until he plays an entire season at that defensive level before we go crowning him as a soon to be top pair guy.
I watched like half of his games and can tell you that the bolded did not happen.
 

FanTheFlames

Registered User
Aug 20, 2017
382
189
Fox made it pretty clear to both Calgary and Carolina he only had a desire to play in New York that's a huge red flag for anyone trying to trade for him.
 

StevenB

Registered User
Oct 7, 2014
1,847
1,096
North York
1) Kudos for legit offer. I would guess Toronto would want prospect(s) that are near nhl level ready rather than picks but you put out a hmm offer for sure.

If Toronto were to win the lottery, they should keep the pick and trade a 10m player not named Matthews. This year TML is in salary cap inconvenience. By 20-21 they are full blown salary cap hades.
Tavares has an NMC so the odd man out here is Marner. Nylander at 7M is better than Marner at ~11M although Marner is the better player.
 

The S5

Registered User
Jul 27, 2017
4,423
4,218
In the first half Fox was not as good defensively, and he regularly got beat on the rush. then the second half he played like a rock and Im not taking that away from him

Once again lets wait until he plays an entire season at that defensive level before we go crowning him as a soon to be top pair guy.
Nonsense. I watched every game. Was he Nick Lidstrom? No, but he was great considering he was a rookie. He made a few bad reads in the neutral zone early on, but didn't get beat on the rush.
 

One Winged Angel

You Can't Escape
May 3, 2006
16,535
3,464
Long Island
I think at this point it's fair to ask - Have you actually watched him play? If so, how many games?

I’d say the answer is probably zero.

Yeah I'm sure he'd be the first prospect who was traded for less than their worth. Lol can't believe you'd use that as part of your justification. Maybe your posts would carry more credibility if you actually explained what's going to prevent Fox from continuing to be what he already is (a top pairing defenseman).

Tells me that my post is worthless because I used the “you haven’t actually watched ___” line, then he proceeds to provide zero reasoning as to why Fox will never be a top pairing defender while I explained exactly why he will continue to be.

Further more, Fox’s lateral movement and ability to out-wait and out-think forecheckers/defenders and goad them into making the first move and missing him is uncanny and he’s doing this against NHL players while his skating, strength and conditioning could still improve.

Irony is so much fun.
 

One Winged Angel

You Can't Escape
May 3, 2006
16,535
3,464
Long Island
In the first half Fox was not as good defensively, and he regularly got beat on the rush. then the second half he played like a rock and Im not taking that away from him

You clearly didn’t watch him at all. He’s been great since day one.

Once again lets wait until he plays an entire season at that defensive level before we go crowning him as a soon to be top pair guy.

Soon to be? Him and Lindgren are ALREADY the Rangers top pairing. Thanks for proving that you haven’t watched him at all.
 

Kupo

MAFIA, MOUNT UP!
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2017
11,403
24,068
Stamford CT
In the first half Fox was not as good defensively, and he regularly got beat on the rush. then the second half he played like a rock and Im not taking that away from him

Once again lets wait until he plays an entire season at that defensive level before we go crowning him as a soon to be top pair guy.

This is complete horseshit and 100% untrue.

You’re clearly a Ranger hater who didn’t watch much of Fox this year.

You’re biased and don’t know wtf you’re talking about. Literally, everyone who regularly watched Fox would disagree with the foolish statement you made of him regarding the 1st half of the season.

He was a steady rock all year from us. It started in training camp and lasted consistently all season long.

Stop making pretend you know what you’re talking about. It’s so obvious you didn’t watch much of him.

tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: One Winged Angel

Pitaya

Prince of the Alps, Nico Hischier
Dec 14, 2019
2,708
1,825
Yes its Rangers hate - Fox is clearly going to be a top pair defenseman after 70 games

Just like Shestyorkin is a top goaltender after 12 and Zibanejad is supposed to be considered a top center in the league cause of one great season.

Gee, its almost like the Rangers had an unsustainable scoring streak in the late half of the season with a rookie goaltender carrying them and all of a sudden theyre Somehow only a few pieces off if being a contender cause of a ~20-30 game stretch lmfao

Big city, big lights, big hype I guess
 
Last edited:

One Winged Angel

You Can't Escape
May 3, 2006
16,535
3,464
Long Island
Yes its Rangers hate - Fox is clearly going to be a top pair defenseman after 70 games

Or it could be because things that we see from watching him on a nightly basis. Like having an off the charts hockey IQ at 22. Or his excellent passing. Or the fact that he’s so cool and calm under forecheck pressure that the vast majority of the time, he finds the perfect play to make whether it be an outlet/area/stretch pass out of the zone instead of just dumping it and is a possession monster because of that. It could also be his insane passing. Could also be the fact that as a rookie defender on a bad team, he put up over 40 points while not being on the 1st power play unit for the vast majority of the season. It could be his staggering advanced statistics, many of which are better than his rookie contemporaries in Cale Makar and Quinn Hughes.

Just like Shestyorkin is a top goaltender after 12 and Zibanejad is supposed to be considered a top center in the league cause of one great season.

Shestyorkin will be a great goaltender and has put up great numbers at every level he’s played at, including the NHL.

As for Zibanejad, thanks for proving you didn’t watch him last year.

Gee, its almost like the Rangers had an unsustainable scoring streak in the late half of the season with a rookie goaltender carrying them and all of a sudden theyre Somehow only a few pieces off if being a contender cause of a ~20-30 game stretch lmfao

Big city, big lights, big hype I guess

Gee it’s like you almost think that all of their young players have peaked as rookies. It couldn’t possibly be because Kakko, Fox, Shestyorkin and Chytil will all get better with time and experience and that they still have one of the top-10 best farm systems in the league despite the graduations from prospect status this year.

But you claim to watch and know so much about a team that you clearly hate, so I shouldn’t need to explain all of that to you. You should already know.
 
Last edited:

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
27,756
3,754
Da Big Apple
Tavares has an NMC so the odd man out here is Marner. Nylander at 7M is better than Marner at ~11M although Marner is the better player.

Just one asterisk here...
due to cap reality, WN easier to move/relocate than MM, means WN delivers less if any discounted value in trade, while hard to see any scenario where eating almost 11 per long term in flat cap is construct that makes absorbing MM's big #s is easily doable.
Doable, just not easily.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad