garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
Hmm... 5th or 6th round estimation...
If that is the case (which Pronman is obviously only one opinion, although one I respect highly), unlikely that Chevy would have gotten much value in trade.
I think it's quite clear garret is supposing. It is odd that Yuen wasn't signed. There isn't an obvious reason hence the supposition and guess work.
1) I don't think it could (should) be contract limits, because Jets even with all RFA signings, a backup goalie, and the #2RW that Chevy covets would still one of the lower counts in the league
Well, the point being that, both here and on twitter, it seems like there are a lot of attempts being made to paint the issue a certain manner or light, attempts being made in a vacuum of information. The reason behind a lack of a signing could just as easily be due a chronic injury or pain issue, or perhaps the player would now prefer to go to university instead of playing hockey for a living. Many seem to be seeking an "aha!" moment versus simply acknowledging that things don't always work out to plan.
I'm reminded of an interview that Chevy gave during the prospect camp last season. He basically stated that, while it would be nice to envision all of the players at that camp one day donning a Jets uni, the reality is that many of them won't due any myriad of circumstances, that perhaps in some cases they've more openings available at certain positions versus others, and that in other cases players simply play themselves out of the system. It just seems to me that some should take from those words that the prospect list is more fluid than they believe it to be.
Whatever. Carry on with the speculation within a vacuum.
or1) something personal or the like that caused an issue (whether that be for Yuen or TNSE)
I'm going on something happened that we don't know... Like maybe something in family, or personal, or who knows...
I'm just merely discussing probabilities... which are not in a vacuum as we do have some information, which I point out to, although not with all information as none of us have the privilege of... no matter who you are... unless you are Chevy *gasp* JK hahaI'm not really steamed as some people are, more thinking out loud (or I guess in type haha) to try to find a logical explanation, since we probably won't be hearing one
I'm not seeking an "aha!" moment although many here could be...
Just like Truck, if he goes earlier than 6th round, it is a mark on Chevy that he should have started the ELC procedure earlier to trade if it didn't seem like it was going to happen.
You're not looking at the whole picture. If he goes 2-5th round, he still had trade value even unsigned. That has nothing to do wether or not we thought he would work out. The two are completely tangent to each other. He's a young prospect with value, and that value disappeared into nothing.
Yet when you said this...
it seems to run counter to that claim. What you view as a mark can alternatively be seen as an attempt to parlay two late picks into a player... a player that just didn't work out for the franchise for whatever reason. I'd rather the GM initially took that risk in that case and don't see the failure to complete a deal as a mark whatsoever, especially given that we don't even know why the franchise didn't conclude a deal to begin with. It didn't work out, but at least they took a shot. You also don't know when the team initially approached the player to make a deal, so that claim rings hollow as well.
Hmm... 5th or 6th round estimation...
If that is the case (which Pronman is obviously only one opinion, although one I respect highly), unlikely that Chevy would have gotten much value in trade.
Or, you may be overestimating the value of a mid-range pick. If GM's feel he will be a mid-to-late round pick then they aren't likely to offer anything for a player they know they can acquire for free at the end of June.
I don't understand your line of logic here.Or, you may both be overestimating the value of a mid-range pick. If GMs' feel he will be a mid-to-late round pick then they aren't likely to offer anything for a player they know they can acquire for free at the end of June. This isn't Bobby Orr we are talking about but rather is simply one of many players than went unsigned.
Huh...
I'm saying *if* a GM is willing to spend a draft pick higher than a 6th round, the would likely also be willing to pay a lesser value draft pick for the exact same player...
Falling to FA would still fit what I said... If he falls to FA then it would apply to how I said that then Yuen has no trade value and therefore no mark against Chevy.
Name being Bobby Orr or not would still not differ the situation.
You are perhaps assuming again, this time that they either wanted to, or had the time to trade his rights. We don't have any confirming information to basically anything so this is all blind speculation on all sides; that would be the point.
Have a nice day! I have work to do.
If Chevy waited too long to negotiate in order to get a decent read if this was going to happen or not...
That's still on him.
No difference.
Not really; it takes two parties to sign a deal. Perhaps they extended their best offer and the player took a pass at the deadline? This isn't a player that they needed to sign at all costs and I'm quite sure the team was well aware of the ramifications of his going unsigned. No mark, but rather, perhaps our manager just assigns value differently than do you.
Good day.
No...
If the other party is not willing to negotiate in a timely manner you get what you can.
It has nothing to do with MY personal assessment of value or heck even Chevy's assessment of value but simple asset management.
If it looks like you are getting no value from the asset one way, then try another. If someone takes Yuen early, then obviously either Chevy dropped the ball by not looking or dropped the ball by not putting a negotiating deadline early enough to give him the freedom to look.
Again, you are essentially assuming with that statement that the team didn't consider all options when dealing with him; I'm betting they did and it just didn't work out for some reason or another. Oh well.
Cheers.
No...
If the other party is not willing to negotiate in a timely manner you get what you can.
It has nothing to do with MY personal assessment of value or heck even Chevy's assessment of value but simple asset management.
If it looks like you are getting no value from the asset one way, then try another. If someone takes Yuen early, then obviously either Chevy dropped the ball by not looking or dropped the ball by not putting a negotiating deadline early enough to give him the freedom to look.
It may not even matter, as maybe Yuen goes in a late round because there is no interest or heck maybe he doesn't even get re-drafted. In this case maybe Chevy did look and there was nothing.
Fair point
however, what if Chevy tried trading him and no one wanted too?
We don't know that at this point either
Fair point
however, what if Chevy tried trading him and no one wanted too?
We don't know that at this point either
I see no trade value in Yuen. Can anyone tell me how often a low round unsigned prospect on the verge of re-entering the draft is dealt for something?
I see no trade value in Yuen. Can anyone tell me how often a low round unsigned prospect on the verge of re-entering the draft is dealt for something?
Be tough to tell because you wouldn't know.
A GM may have tried negotiating the ELC at any point after they are drafted, not get what they wanted and trade the prospect.
So any unsigned prospect could *potentially* be that case... although closer they are to the dead-line, the more likely the case.
Fair point
however, what if Chevy tried trading him and no one wanted too?
We don't know that at this point either